Remote AI Media Evaluator — Flexible Hours, Free LLM Access

Outlier; Corvallis (OR); Remoto; USD 20.000 - 29.000; Tempo pieno

Vantaggi offerti da questo lavoro

Pay up to $18/hr

Flexible hours

Remote work

Free AI tools access

Missions surge pay

Descrizione del lavoro

Outlier seeks detail-oriented English speakers to review AI-generated media. You will roleplay live conversations with an AI voice model, compare generated images and videos to judge which follows the prompt better, and explain in writing what looked or sounded wrong, all remotely on your schedule.

Contributors review tasks across image, video, and audio evaluations, rating outputs on adherence, quality, and realism, and provide a concise English explanation.

Competenze

• Fluent English with clear written communication.
• Strong attention to detail and patience to replay or zoom in.
• Nice to have: Bachelor's degree or above.
• Comfortable thinking on your feet and discussing realistic situations.
• Experience writing short, evidence-based explanations or reviews.
• Able to make a clear decision when both options have flaws.
• Currently accepting applicants from: Australia, Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, United States.

Mansioni

• Holding live, scenario-based conversations in English with AI voice models.
• Ranking how natural, useful, and clear each exchange sounded.
• Comparing AI-generated images and videos and judging prompt adherence.
• Inspecting outputs to spot issues like distorted anatomy, flickering or abnormal motion, text errors, and audio-video mismatches.
• Writing specific explanations in English that point to observed issues.

Conoscenze

Fluent English

Attention to detail

Clear written communication

Think on your feet

Experience writing reviews

Formazione

Bachelor's degree or above

Descrizione del lavoro

Outlier seeks detail-oriented English speakers to review AI-generated media. You will roleplay live conversations with an AI voice model, compare generated images and videos to judge which follows the prompt better, and explain in writing what looked or sounded wrong, all remotely on your schedule.

Contributors review tasks across image, video, and audio evaluations, rating outputs on adherence, quality, and realism, and provide a concise English explanation.