Marketing Campaign Proofing Assistant

HRS Talent Solutions; Savannah (GA); Remote; USD 40,000 - 43,000; Part time

Job summary

HRS Talent Solutions is seeking a Marketing Campaign Proofing Assistant to work remotely on a part-time basis. The role focuses on reviewing two approved campaign versions against briefs, checking dates and links, and flagging discrepancies. No copywriting or campaign launches are involved.

The ideal candidate has sharp attention to detail and comfort describing differences between documents. Training will be provided, and experience in marketing, customer service, or office administration is

Qualifications

• Experience in marketing, customer service, or office administration is helpful but not required.
• You should be comfortable comparing two documents and describing differences precisely.

Responsibilities

• Review assigned online campaign previews and approved briefs.
• Check dates, links, and version-specific fields.
• Record which test version you examined.
• Flag unexplained differences for the campaign owner.
• Avoid editing approved copy without instruction.
• Retest corrected material when requested.
• Keep a clear status of ready and unresolved items.
• Proof each audience’s version.

Skills

Office administration

Proofreading

Attention to detail

Job description

Marketing Campaign Proofing Assistant

Remote | Part-time | $29.10 - $31.25 per hour

Two approved versions of a marketing message may look nearly identical while serving different audiences. This remote job checks each online draft against its own brief, looking at dates, links, names and other supplied details before a campaign owner releases it. The position calls for office administration accuracy and an awareness of the customer service questions a wrong detail can cause. You will not choose a winning message, create a new offer or launch a campaign.

A home office provides a focused space to compare campaign versions without exposing contact lists on a shared screen.

A difference may be intentional

The two versions may have a different greeting or offer description by design. Compare each against its own approved brief rather than forcing them to match. If one message has a different link or date with no explanation, flag it. A simple proof note should identify the version and the exact element in question. Do not silently copy text from one variant to another. The campaign owner decides whether the difference is correct.

Some versions may be prepared for different languages or customer groups. Use the employer's supplied source and seek review where a language difference requires someone qualified to check it. Keep test records and preview links within approved tools. After an authorized correction, inspect the new test version. A proof of an older file does not validate the final send.

What you may handle

• Review assigned online campaign previews and approved briefs.
• Check dates, links, and version-specific fields.
• Record which test version you examined.
• Flag unexplained differences for the campaign owner.
• Avoid editing approved copy without instruction.
• Retest corrected material when requested.
• Keep a clear status of ready and unresolved items.

Experience in marketing, customer service, or office administration can help, but no specialist background is required. The employer will train a beginner on its version labels and proof process. You should be comfortable comparing two documents and describing differences precisely.

Compare each variant against its brief

• Is the audience label correct for the proof?
• Does the intended offer or service description match?
• Are dates and times current for that version?
• Do links lead to the right online destination?
• Are personalization fields displayed as expected in the test?
• Did a revision create a new version needing another review?

The team may send test messages to internal accounts that use placeholder names. Note that context when reporting a personalization issue. If one version is ready and the other has an unresolved difference, record separate statuses. A single “campaign approved” label could hide the issue. The owner may ask you to check a final version after a correction; compare it with the approved brief again rather than assuming only the flagged line changed. This is a quality review, not an invitation to make unrequested edits to campaign language.

A late revision to one variant may alter a link shared across both. Check what the campaign owner asks you to retest. If an internal reviewer approves one version by email, link that approval to the exact test file rather than adding a broad completion note. A clear record reduces the chance that a draft is confused with the version that actually goes to recipients.

This work requires an exact version check before a proof can be considered complete.

Proof each audience’s version

A version intended for current customers may use a different link from a version intended for new contacts. That difference is not an error if the brief specifies it. Check each draft independently before comparing them with one another. Mark the exact location of a discrepancy and identify the approved source rather than rewriting the copy from memory. If the brief itself contains conflicting dates, pause for the campaign owner’s decision. After a correction, proof the latest version again; a clean review of an earlier draft does not cover an updated send.

Your application

You may have proofed a newsletter, checked event details or compared documents in another kind of work. Such experience is useful but not required; the marketing team will explain its briefs and approval system. We welcome beginners who notice small differences and can describe them without guessing. If you’re selected for the next step, you may be asked to complete an application on the hiring company’s website. This role does not require copywriting or campaign-management experience.