TypeScript Evaluator

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 28,000 - 55,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs seeks a remote TypeScript Evaluator to review evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's rubric. You’ll compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and provide structured feedback for retraining.

As a remote contractor, you will assess model outputs, tag issues, and help calibrate other evaluators, with at least 10 hours per week available. Compensation is $20–$40 per hour.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human‑rater experience on TypeScript evaluation or adjacent content.
• Comfort applying multi‑page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate TypeScript evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for TypeScript Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer‑quality scores by calibrating against gold‑standard examples each week.

Skills

TypeScript evaluation

Model output evaluation

Rubric-based annotation

Inter-rater calibration

LeetCode

Typescript

Tools

LeetCode

Job description

TypeScript Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing typescript evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Category: Frontier Model Evaluation · Pay: $20–$40 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

TypeScript Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing typescript evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric.

Role details

About the role

TypeScript Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing typescript evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.
AI data reviewers help turn typescript evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.
Review frontier model outputs. Judge benchmark failures and calibrate other evaluators.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate typescript evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for TypeScript Evaluator assignments.


• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.


• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.


• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.


• Maintain reviewer‑quality scores by calibrating against gold‑standard examples each week.

What you should bring

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human‑rater experience on typescript evaluation or adjacent content for TypeScript Evaluator work.


• Comfort applying multi‑page rubrics consistently across long batches.


• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.


• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.


• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Compare two typescript evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.


• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.


• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.


• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Useful experience

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.


• Experience with inter‑rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.


• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject‑matter errors automated checks miss.

Compensation and schedule

$20–$40 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program‑defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Model output evaluation


• Rubric‑based annotation


• Severity tagging


• Inter‑rater calibration


• TypeScript evaluation


• LeetCode


• Typescript

Application boundary

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

Specialist intake

• - 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.


• - 02 Attach this role deliberately.


• - 03 Receive a human review decision or follow‑up.

Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.