Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 41,000 - 83,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne is hiring for a Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator. This remote contractor role involves reviewing scientific research and citation evaluation prompts against a quality rubric, comparing outputs, labeling edge cases, and providing structured feedback for retraining.

Responsibilities include evaluating model outputs, selecting stronger answers with rationale, tagging issues, and routing ambiguous prompts for rubric updates.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on scientific research and citation evaluation or adjacent content.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate scientific research and citation evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Skills

Evaluator experience

Quality rubric

Written rationale

Attention to detail

Async availability

Job description

Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing scientific research and citation evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Category: Search, Web & Browser Agents · Pay: $30–$60 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing scientific research and citation evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric.

About the role

Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing scientific research and citation evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.
AI data reviewers help turn scientific research and citation evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.
Review browser automation and multi-step search agents. Check whether sources hold up.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate scientific research and citation evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Role details

Track Evaluation & annotation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process. Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on scientific research and citation evaluation or adjacent content for Scientific Research and Citation Evaluator work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Compare two scientific research and citation evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Useful experience

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Compensation and schedule

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Scientific Research and Citation evaluation
• Science and advanced mathematics
• AI evaluation
• Rubric writing
• Expert review

Application boundary

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

Specialist intake

The intake preserves your chosen role, the visible terms, and source attribution for reviewer context.
- 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.
- 02 Attach this role deliberately.
- 03 Receive a human review decision or follow-up.
Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.