An application made for this job — a tailored resume and cover letter that speak straight to the posting.
WHOOP is seeking a Senior Product Manager to own the internal AI development platform and define how AI output quality is measured across WHOOP’s experiences. You will work with AI engineers, researchers, and data scientists to set evaluation methodology, data usage, and provider choices while balancing latency and cost across initiatives.
You’ll shape the adoption of the internal AI platform, enable self-serve evals, and drive multi-team shipping of AI features.
WHOOP is hiring a Senior Product Manager to work at that layer, alongside our AI engineers, research scientists, and data scientists. The work spans how AI output quality gets measured and enforced, which models and providers power which experiences, the internal AI platform that teams across WHOOP use to build agents, and which emerging techniques from the research world are worth a bet
This is a platform-oriented AI product role. Your users are as often internal (agent authors, analysts, engineers, research scientists) as they are members. It suits someone technical enough to earn the trust of ML researchers, organized enough to run a program across several teams without direct authority, and disciplined enough to say no to most of what is possible
Shape how AI output quality is measured across WHOOP’s AI experiences, including the evaluation methodology, datasets, and scoring that make quality continuous and trusted rather than judged case by case
Build the evaluation habit across the company: make evals self-serve, and get the teams shipping AI features to actually run them
Help decide which models power which experiences, and which providers we run them on, balancing quality, latency, and cost as the model landscape shifts
Product-manage our internal AI development platform and drive its adoption, so that anyone at WHOOP building with AI has a fast, well-instrumented path from idea to shipped
Track the unit economics of AI at WHOOP, including cost per interaction, and drive the tradeoffs between quality, latency, and spend
Explore where AI capability goes next, from fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to distillation and emerging foundation models, and turn a broad field of options into a small number of well-scoped bets, starting with internal productivity
Experience with platform or internal-facing products, where the users are other teamsNice to have: internal AI tooling or evaluation frameworks; experience partnering with a research organization; wearables or sensor data; SQL or light scriptingWorking literacy in modern ML: you understand what fine-tuning is and the main flavors of it, what RL-based post-training is for, and how the current generation of techniques fits together. You do not need to implement them, but you should know what they buy you and what they costDepth in evaluation and measurement: you have defined how something gets measured, not only reported on itSound business judgment: you can quantify a tradeoff, reason about cost, and decline work that will not pay for itselfComfort operating in ambiguity, with evidence of turning a broad set of possibilities into one well-scoped betTechnical fluency sufficient to partner with research and engineering as a peer, and to translate model behavior into member experienceStrong commitment to embracing and leveraging AI tools in day-to-day tasks, ensuring AI-assisted work aligns with the same high-quality standards as personal contributionsExperience shipping AI or machine learning products, where the underlying capability was probabilistic rather than deterministicA track record of driving cross-team programs with many dependencies and no direct authority