Instruction Tuning Reward Model Evaluator

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 28,000 - 48,000; Part time

Job summary

AuraOne is seeking an experienced remote contractor to evaluate instruction tuning reward model outputs according to a versioned rubric. You will compare paired responses, label edge cases, and write structured feedback for the modeling team to retrain.

Responsibilities include labeling hallucinations and unsafe content, capturing ambiguous prompts, and providing calibration through inter-rater discipline. This is a remote, contractor role with hourly compensation to be confirmed after interview.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on instruction tuning reward model evaluation.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate instruction tuning reward model evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags.
• Compare paired responses and provide a written rationale for the stronger answer.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Skills

Evaluation experience

Rubrics & criteria understanding

Written reasoning

Attention to detail

Async availability

Inter-rater calibration

Job description

Instruction Tuning Reward Model Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing instruction tuning reward model evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Category: RLHF & Human Preference Data · Pay: Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Instruction Tuning Reward Model Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing instruction tuning reward model evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric.

About the role

Instruction Tuning Reward Model Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing instruction tuning reward model evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.
AI data reviewers help turn instruction tuning reward model evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.
Produce preference rankings, reward-model feedback, and calibrated human judgment for post-training pipelines.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate instruction tuning reward model evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Instruction Tuning Reward Model Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Role details

Track Evaluation & annotation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process. Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on instruction tuning reward model evaluation or adjacent content for Instruction Tuning Reward Model Evaluator work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Compare two instruction tuning reward model evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Useful experience

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Compensation and schedule

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Instruction Tuning Reward Model evaluation
• Preference ranking
• RLHF
• Rater calibration
• Instruction
• Tuning

Application boundary

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

Specialist intake

The intake preserves your chosen role, the visible terms, and source attribution for reviewer context.

• 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.
• 02 Attach this role deliberately.
• 03 Receive a human review decision or follow-up.

Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.