Generalist for Data Annotation

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 28,000 - 41,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. seeks a Remote Generalist for Data Annotation to evaluate model outputs against a rubric and provide structured feedback for retraining. This is a contractor role, US-eligible, with async availability of at least 10 hours per week and weekly calibration against gold-standard samples.

You will compare paired responses, label edge cases, and write clear rationales, flag content issues, and document recurring failure modes to guide future rubric updates for AuraOne Human Data.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on related data annotation tasks.
• Ability to apply multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning citing rubric clauses.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags.
• Compare paired responses and select the stronger answer with rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them for rubric updates.
• Calibrate reviewer-quality scores against gold-standard examples weekly.
• Document recurring failure modes for training improvements.

Skills

Model output evaluation

Rubric-based annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Generalist for Data Annotation

Job description

Generalist for Data Annotation is a remote evaluation track for reviewing generalist for data annotation evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn generalist for data annotation evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate generalist for data annotation evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Generalist for Data Annotation assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on generalist for data annotation evaluation or adjacent content for Generalist for Data Annotation work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Compare two generalist for data annotation evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Nice to have

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Skills

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Generalist for Data Annotation evaluation

Work model

Remote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.