Get a reply from this employer
Your resume and cover letter, tailored to exactly what they’re hiring for.
Ladders in Los Angeles seeks an Employment Associate (California) with strong labor and employment law background. The role focuses on employment litigation for a tech client, with responsibilities spanning pleadings, discovery, and trial strategy, plus advisory work for HR matters.
The successful candidate will have a JD, California bar admission, and 2+ years of relevant experience, with trial exposure valued. The position offers a high salary and a hybrid work setup in Los Angeles.
This opportunity was posted more than 30 days ago and no application deadline was provided. You can explore active listings below.
L
Organising Institution / Firm
Ladders
Not Specified by Organiser
Not Specified
JD degree required; admitted to practice in California; minimum 2 years in labor and employment law; strong knowledge of California Labor Code and employment laws; trial experience preferred. US-based candidates only, no visa sponsorship available.
Full-time Employment Associate (Labor & Employment Law)
California has long been the nation's most plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction for workers, with a sprawling Labor Code, Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims, and aggressive class action litigation. For employment attorneys, this means every case carries multi-million-dollar exposure and nuanced procedural traps. The Employment Associate (California) position posted by Ladders for a client in Los Angeles sits directly in this pressure cooker, offering a rare combination of high compensation, hybrid flexibility, and substantive litigation work.
The role is not a typical entry-level posting. Ladders, a platform known for connecting professionals with six-figure opportunities, is recruiting on behalf of a leader in the Enterprise Technology space. The client needs someone who can step in and manage employment litigation while advising on reductions in force, employment agreements, and day-to-day compliance issues. The base pay range of $235,000 to $365,000 signals that this is a mid-senior position demanding immediate competency, not a training role.
"Our client is an equal opportunity employer. We encourage you to apply even if you don't meet every qualification—your background could be exactly what this team needs."
This inclusive language suggests the hiring team wants motivated candidates who may not perfectly check every box, but the core requirements—California bar admission, a JD, and two years of labor and employment experience—remain non-negotiable.
The responsibilities listed in the job description paint a clear picture of a working litigator rather than a paper-pushing generalist. You will be expected to hit the ground running in the following areas:
The emphasis on PAGA claims is particularly important. PAGA allows employees to sue on behalf of the state for labor code violations, and recent amendments have created new pleading and exhaustion requirements. An attorney who understands PAGA's shifting procedural landscape is worth a premium. The job posting makes clear that trial experience is preferred, not required, but any candidate with first-chair or meaningful second-chair trial exposure will have an edge.
Applicants must hold a Juris Doctor from an accredited law school and be admitted to practice in California. The two-year minimum in labor and employment law is a strict floor; the successful candidate will likely have four to six years of practice if they are competing against other mid-senior associates. The posting also stresses "strong knowledge of the California Labor Code and employment laws," which goes beyond general familiarity. You need to know the Industrial Welfare Commission wage orders, meal and rest break rules, waiting time penalties, and the nuances of California's anti-discrimination statutes under FEHA.
US-based candidates only, with no visa sponsorship available, means international attorneys without independent work authorization need not apply. The role is location-flexible within a hybrid model, but the primary office is Los Angeles. If you are already in Southern California, this is an excellent opportunity to step into a technology-sector legal role.
Working as an employment associate for an enterprise technology client gives you exposure to cutting-edge workplace issues: remote work policies, AI-driven hiring tools, global teams, and executive compensation structures. These are the issues that will dominate employment law for the next decade. By handling class actions and PAGA suits, you will build a portable litigation skill set that translates to any law firm or in-house position.
The compensation package is another standout. The base range of $235k-$365k places this role firmly in the top tier for employment associates in Los Angeles, where the median for mid-level associates is often lower. The benefits include comprehensive medical, dental, and vision insurance, a 401(k) plan, and a hybrid work environment. Beyond the tangible rewards, the posting highlights a "supportive company culture valuing excellence and development" and "opportunities for professional growth and learning"—signals that the client invests in its legal team.
No. The posting explicitly states "US based candidates only, no visa sponsorship available." While hybrid work offers some remote flexibility, you must be based in the US and likely in or able to relocate to Los Angeles. California bar admission is required, so out-of-state attorneys would need to have active California status.
PAGA claims are a central component of California employment litigation. The associate will likely be responsible for evaluating PAGA notices, preparing responsive pleadings, conducting discovery, and potentially negotiating settlements. Because PAGA has its own procedural quirks, having recent, direct experience is a strong advantage.
The offered range of $235,000-$365,000 is above market average for a mid-senior employment associate in Los Angeles, especially in a non-partnership track role. It reflects the technology sector's willingness to pay for specialized regulatory expertise. You can expect strong competition from associates at top law firms and in-house teams.
The word "preferred" means it is not required, but it can be the deciding factor between two otherwise equal candidates. If you lack trial experience, highlight any evidentiary hearings, arbitrations, or dispositive motion victories that demonstrate courtroom readiness.