Consigue una respuesta de este empleador
Tu currículum y tu carta de presentación, adaptados exactamente a lo que buscan contratar.
FEUP in Porto invites applications for an Entry-Level PhD Researcher within the SAVERACK project. The researcher will perform R&D in civil engineering, reviewing seismic design of storage racks and developing a displacement-based approach and fragility curves for seismic risk assessment.
Based at FEUP, the role includes a 12-month duration with a fixed-term contract, a gross monthly base remuneration of €3,019.58 plus holiday and Christmas allowances and a meal allowance, and potential teaching
Organisation/Company FEUP Department Human Resources Division Research Field Engineering » Civil engineering Engineering » Other Researcher Profile First Stage Researcher (R1) Positions PhD Positions Application Deadline 10 Nov 2026 - 23:59 (Europe/Lisbon) Country Portugal Type of Contract Temporary Job Status Full-time Hours Per Week 35 Is the job funded through the EU Research Framework Programme? Horizon Europe Is the Job related to staff position within a Research Infrastructure? No
NOTICE OF OPENING OF AN INTERNATIONAL SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR THE RECRUITMENT OF AN ENTRY-LEVEL PhD RESEARCHER AT THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PORTO –
(Fixed-term employment contract of uncertain duration)
By order dated 06/10/2026, of the Dean of FEUP, Professor Rui Artur Bártolo Calçada, it was decided to open an international selection procedure for one position of Entry-Level PhD Researcher, within the scope of Project SAVERACK (Sustainable, advanced and economical retrofitting strategies for reducing the seismic vulnerabilty and risk of steel storage pallet racks)( 101216407),unded by European Commission, through the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, under an Fixed-term employment contract of uncertain duration, as required by law, pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of the RJEC, ex vi Article 18(2) of Decree-Law No. 57/2016 of 29 August, as currently worded, the Labour Code, approved by Law No. 7/2009 of 12 February, as currently worded, Regulatory Decree No. 11-A/2017 of 29 December, Regulation No. 849/2026 of 07/07 - Regulation on Research, Science and Technology Staff of the University of Porto (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation), and other applicable legislation, and shall remain in force only for the period necessary to carry out the tasks defined in the project and identified below, whose expected duration is 12 months, never exceeding the maximum limit of six years.
The Entry-Level PhD Researcher shall, in general terms, perform the activities provided for in Article 8(2)(a) of Regulation No. 849/2026 of 7 July. Specifically, the Entry-Level PhD Researcher will carry out R&D activities within Project SAVERACK (Sustainable, advanced and economical retrofitting strategies for reducing the seismic vulnerabilty and risk of steel storage pallet racks), falling within the scientific area of Civil Engineering, contributing to the following project activities provided for in the application:
The researcher to be hired may also provide occasional collaboration in teaching and training activities in the research area.
The workplace is located at the Department of Civil and Georesources Engineering of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto (FEUP), as well as at any other locations where the duties for which the employee is hired need to be performed, including locations intended for the respective professional training.
The gross monthly base remuneration is€3.019,58, corresponding to the 3rd remuneration position, level 5, under an exclusive dedication regime, of the remuneration table set out in Annexes I and II to Regulation No. 849/2026 of 7 July, plus holiday and Christmas allowances, as well as meal allowance, under the terms and in the amounts applicable to employees holding a public employment relationship.
National, foreign and stateless citizens holding a PhD degree* in the scientific area of Civil and Georresources Engineering (or in scientific areas related to that for which the selection procedure is opened), awarded no more than 5 years ago, and holding a scientific and professional curriculum demonstrating a profile suited to the activity to be performed, may apply to this selection procedure.
*If the PhD degree was awarded by a foreign higher education institution, it must be recognised by a Portuguese higher education institution, pursuant to Article 25 of Decree-Law No. 66/2018 of 16 August, which approves the legal framework for the recognition of academic degrees and higher education diplomas awarded by foreign higher education institutions, and Article 4(2)(e) of Decree-Law No. 60/2018 of 3 August, with any formalities established therein having to be completed by the date on which the employment contract is entered into.
For the purposes of determining the profile suited to the activity to be performed, the following are specific requirements:
Pursuant to Article 29 of Regulation No. 849/2026 of 7 July and Article 5 of the RJEC, the following selection methods shall apply:
5.1. The assessment of the scientific and curricular background shall focus on the relevance, quality and up-to-dateness of the following criteria:
a) Scientific, technological, cultural or artistic output from the last five years considered most relevant by the candidate;
b) Applied or practice-based research activities carried out over the last five years and considered by the candidate to have the greatest impact;
c) Knowledge transfer and dissemination activities carried out over the last five years, particularly in the context of promoting scientific culture and practices, considered most relevant by the candidate;
d) Management activities in science, technology and innovation programmes, or experience in observing and monitoring the scientific and technological system or higher education, in Portugal or abroad.
5.2. The period referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be calculated by reference to the 5 (five) years immediately preceding the closing date for applications.
5.3. The five-year period referred to in the preceding paragraph may be extended by the Selection Committee, at the candidate’s request, where scientific activity has been suspended for socially protected reasons, namely parental leave, prolonged serious illness, and other legally protected situations of unavailability for work (in which case the candidate must indicate the requested assessment period and attach documentary evidence of the grounds invoked).
5.4. In applying the criteria referred to in point 5.1., the following parameters shall be assessed, with the weighting factors indicated:
5.4.1. Scientific and Professional Background (PCP) (5%)
PCP1. Professional research experience in the scientific area of the selection procedure (80%).
PCP2. Professional experience in the design and seismic performance assessment of steel structures and storage systems (20%).
5.4.2. Scientific, Technological, Cultural or Artistic Output (PCTCA) (90%):
PCTCA1.: Participation in research projects as well as scientific output, especially the publication of scientific articles in high-quality international peer-reviewed journals as first author. The list of publications must be included in the curriculum vitae with a clear indication of the statistical analyses used, including the candidate’s role in implementing them (70%);
PCTCA2. Development of collaborations with international researchers and periods of study or research abroad (15%);
PCTCA3. Duly documented teaching in degree-awarding study cycles (bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral) and in continuing education courses (15%).
5.4.3. Knowledge Transfer and Dissemination Activities (AEDC) (5%):
AEDC1.: Review of scientific (20%);
AEDC2. Organisation of scientific events (20%);
AEDC3. Participation in national and international scientific events, peer-reviewed and by invitation (20%);
AEDC4. Experience in scientific supervision at different levels (internships, master’s, doctorates (20%);
AEDC5.Participation in panels for academic examinations (20%).
5.5. The final APCC score is obtained using the following formula: APCC = (0.05 x PCP) + (0.90 x PCTCA) + (0.05 x AEDC).
6.1. Candidates who obtain a score equal to or higher than 75 points, provided that such score is awarded by all members of the Selection Committee in the assessment of the scientific and curricular background (APCC), shall be admitted to the interview stage.
6.2. The Professional Selection Interview (EPS) shall have a maximum duration of one hour and is intended exclusively to clarify aspects related to the research carried out by the candidates.
6.3. The assessment criteria for the Professional Selection Interview (EPS) shall be as set out below, with the weighting factors indicated:
EPS1 . Demonstrated level of knowledge on the competition topic (50%).
EPS2 . Communication performance and skills (synthesis ability, clarity of presentation, critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentative skills (50%).
6.4. The score for the Professional Selection Interview (EPS) is obtained using the following formula: EPS = EPS1 + EPS2 .
7.1. The Final Score (CF) of the Assessment of Scientific and Curricular Background (APCC) and Professional Selection Interview (EPS) shall be obtained using the following formula: CF =(0,9*APCC) + (0,1 *ENT).
Or
The Final Score (CF) is the same as the Assessment of Scientific and Curricular Background (APCC).
7.2. Only candidates who obtain a final score equal to or higher than 75 points, provided that such score is awarded by all members of the Selection Committee, shall be approved.
7.3. Candidates who obtain a score below 50 points in any of the selection methods shall be excluded from the selection procedure and, where applicable, shall not proceed to the following method.
7.4. The casting or tie-breaking vote to be exercised by the Chair of the Selection Committee in the Final Score shall be based on the highest score obtained in the criterion set out in point 5.4.2. Scientific, Technological, Cultural or Artistic Output (PCTCA). If the tie persists, the highest score in the criterion set out in point 5.4.1. Scientific and Professional Background (PCP) shall prevail.
8.1.1. The Selection Committee shall first decide on the admission and exclusion of applications, verifying compliance with the formal application requirements set out in this Notice, as well as fulfilment of the general and specific admission requirements.
8.1.2. Once the admission and exclusion stage has been completed, the Selection Committee shall begin the phased application of the selection methods, first assessing the scientific and curricular background of all admitted candidates.
8.1.3. In the assessment of the scientific and curricular background, only merit shall be considered and, consequently, the candidate’s experience in the scientific area or areas for which the selection procedure is opened shall be evaluated, in accordance with the selection criteria and assessment parameters defined in this Notice.
8.1.4. Before voting begins for the ranking of candidates in the assessment of the scientific and curricular background, each member of the Selection Committee shall submit a written document, to be attached to the minutes, containing the ordered list of candidates in descending order of merit, on a scale from 0 to 100 points, scored to two decimal places, duly reasoned, in accordance with the selection criteria and assessment parameters established in this Notice.
8.1.5. Each member of the Selection Committee must respect, in all votes, the ranking set out in the document referred to in the preceding paragraph.
8.1.6. The Selection Committee shall deliberate by reasoned roll-call vote, in accordance with the selection criteria previously approved and published; abstentions are not permitted.
8.1.7. The ranking methodology to be adopted is that provided for in Article 32 of the Regulation.
8.2. Second meeting:
8.2.1. The Selection Committee shall apply the second selection method to the candidates admitted to this method.
8.2.2. The Professional Selection Interview (EPS) for each candidate shall have a maximum duration of one hour and is intended exclusively to clarify aspects related to the research carried out by the candidates. This method shall be conducted in Portuguese and English.
8.2.3. Failure to attend at the previously scheduled time and place shall result in exclusion from the selection procedure. Candidates whose Professional Selection Interview (EPS), is to be held by videoconference and who, for any reason, are not available at the scheduled time shall likewise be considered excluded for failure to attend.
8.2.4. After the Professional Selection Interview (EPS), has been held and scored, the Selection Committee shall establish the final score and rank the candidates approved in both methods, applying the formula provided for in point 7 of this Notice.
8.3. Third meeting:
8.3.1. If any candidate exercises the right to be heard in the hearing of interested parties, the Selection Committee shall hold a third meeting to consider the arguments submitted, and the Committee’s decisions shall be notified to the candidates.
8.3.2. If the Selection Committee considers the arguments to be well-founded, it shall act in accordance with the decisions taken and notify the candidates accordingly.
8.3.3. If the Selection Committee considers the arguments to be unfounded, after notifying the candidates, it shall submit the procedure for approval by the Rector.
8.3.4. All candidates shall be notified of the approval decision.
The casting or tie-breaking vote to be exercised by the Chair of the Selection Committee in the Final Score shall be based on the highest score obtained in the criterion set out in point 5.4.2. Scientific, Technological, Cultural or Artistic Output (PCTCA). If the tie persists, the highest score in the criterion set out in point 9. Notification of Results shall prevail.
9.1. Notifications shall be made by publication on the Apply UP electronic platform, pursuant to Article 112(1)(c) of the Administrative Procedure Code (CPA), and shall take effect under the terms of Article 113 of the CPA.
9.2. A hearing of interested parties shall take place, pursuant to Articles 121 and 122 of the Administrative Procedure Code, for candidates who have not been admitted and for candidates ranked in a position on the ranking list that cannot be appointed to the position under competition. All candidates shall be notified of the approval of the Selection Committee’s final decision.
9.3. Pursuant to Article 121 and following of the CPA, once notified, candidates have 10 working days to submit their comments through the relevant platform.
In accordance with Article 25(4) to (7) of Regulation No. 849/2026 of 7 July and Article 13 of the RJEC, the Selection Committee shall have the following composition:
Chair of the Selection Committee: José Miguel de Freitas Castro, Associate Professor, FEUP
Full members:
Alternate members:
10.1. In the event of absence or impediment, the Chair of the Selection Committee shall be replaced by the member listed first, who, in the event of the same impediment, shall be replaced by the next listed member, and so on successively.
11.1. Applications must be submitted within 10 working days from the first working day immediately following publication of this Notice in the Diário da República, ending at 23:59 (local time) on 10/11/2026 (Lisbon local time).
11.2. Candidates must access and register on the electronic platform www.apply.up.pt to submit their application, selecting the procedure for which they wish to apply (procedure code: INVTERM-FEUP-26-5), by the deadline. The application shall be completed by filling in the sections available on the Apply UP platform under “My application”.
11.3. The application must be accompanied by documentary evidence of the conditions set out in points 3, 5 and 6 of this Notice, namely:
a) Curriculum Vitae covering the