Get a reply from this employer — a resume and cover letter tailored to exactly what they’re hiring for.
Technical Recruitment Solutions Ltd. seeks a proactive Quality Lead for a hands-on manufacturing role in Auckland.
You will work closely with Production, Engineering, Supply Chain and NPI to identify problems, determine root causes and implement practical, sustainable solutions on the floor. Key focus includes improving product consistency, reducing variation and waste, and driving corrective actions with a culture of food safety.
Our client is a well-established New Zealand food manufacturer of much-loved baked products. This is a hands-on manufacturing environment where quality, consistency and operational performance matter every day.
This is a newly shaped Quality Lead position for someone who wants to be genuinely involved in manufacturing, rather than sitting behind a desk managing paperwork.
You'll be highly visible on the production floor, working closely with Production, Engineering, Supply Chain and New Product Innovation to identify problems, understand what is causing them and make sure they don’t keep happening.
The wider Food Safety and Quality Management System, certification and compliance programmes are owned by the Group Compliance Lead. Your focus will be operational quality: improving product consistency, solving problems, reducing variation and waste, and making sure quality standards are translated into practical day-to-day manufacturing.
You’ll be responsible for:
This is a role where you'll need to get involved, ask questions and challenge the status quo. The position description specifically calls for someone who can identify problems, analyse data, determine root causes and implement practical, sustainable solutions.
We're looking for a quality or technical professional who has moved beyond simply identifying problems and is comfortable taking ownership of fixing them.
Be prepared to show some grit and be someone who sees a problem and thinks, “What is causing this, and how do we stop it happening again?” rather than simply asking who is responsible for fixing it.
You’ll ideally bring: