A complete application in a minute
Tailored resume and cover letter, ready to send.
Alta Ares is seeking a hybrid strategy/engineering professional to rigorously evaluate technology choices and align them with business priorities. You will challenge R&D and Innovation roadmaps, perform capability audits, and influence technology strategy with a business lens, reporting to the Strategy & Operations Director.
This role requires strong strategic thinking, technical credibility, and the ability to communicate complex trade-offs to senior leaders, ensuring economically sound
About the companythe company is an air defense Neoprime. We build AI-guided interceptors to counter drones and cruise missiles, along with the software platform that powers them.
Our customers are NATO-aligned militaries and defense institutions, and our systems are regularly deployed during live exercises and operational demonstrations across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.
Founded in 2024, we have grown to 90 people, raised over $60M, and increased revenue 40× this year. We are now entering a new phase of international expansion, industrial scaling, fundraising, and product development.
ContextWe are looking for hybrid profile, sitting at the intersection of strategy and engineering, able to rigorously evaluate the technology choices made by the R&D and innovation teams, audit our internal capabilities, and challenge product/tech trade-offs with a business lens. This is not a technical team management role, but a role of constructive counter-power and strategic alignment between engineering and business priorities.
You will ensure that our technological decisions (R&D, innovation, architecture choices, build vs buy, roadmap prioritization) are aligned with overall strategy, economically sound, and robust by actively challenging the relevant teams rather than rubber-stamping their proposals.
5-6 years of overall experience, engineering background (degree in engineering or equivalent)
Ideal trajectory: 2-3 years of hands-on technical execution, followed by 2-3 years in a hybrid technical/business role e.g. Engineer → Technical Product Manager, Engineer → tech-focused strategy consulting, or Engineer → Chief of Staff to a CTO/VP Engineering
Profiles with only pure execution experience (no exposure to business trade-offs) or only early technical experience followed by years of generalist consulting (no longer technically credible) are not a fit for this role
Given the seniority level, the candidate should compensate for limited years of experience with either deep, recognized expertise in a specific technical domain (enough to be seen as a peer by R&D on that topic) or a strong, proven track record of challenging senior stakeholders from a strategy/consulting background.
Hands-on experience in a technical environment (dev, data, tech product, architecture, not consulting-only exposure)
Demonstrated ability to understand architecture choices and technical trade-offs, and to assess their relevance
Comfortable engaging as a peer with CTOs, tech leads, and senior engineers
Able to speak in concrete, specific terms about a real technical decision they challenged or questioned
Ability to translate technical issues into business implications, and vice versa
Strong critical thinking and independence of judgment
Able to distinguish a genuine technical risk from a mere communication gap
Natural credibility: earns legitimacy through the rigor of the analysis, not through hierarchy