Activez les alertes d’offres d’emploi par e-mail !
Générez un CV personnalisé en quelques minutes
Décrochez un entretien et gagnez plus. En savoir plus
Un laboratoire de recherche de l'Université de Lorraine propose un poste de doctorant. Le projet vise à étudier l'évolution phénotypique de poissons zèbres dans différents environnements de domestication, en s'appuyant sur des approches moléculaires pour comprendre les dynamiques évolutives. Les candidats doivent avoir un solide bagage en biologie et en aquaculture.
Social network you want to login/join with:
col-narrow-left
France
Other
-
Yes
col-narrow-right
3
30.06.2025
14.08.2025
col-wide
Background
Today, aquaculture is a key sector supporting global food security, particularly through fish production. However, current global aquaculture remains heavily dependent on a limited number of species. This reliance poses ecological, economic, and food security challenges, ultimately threatening the long-term sustainability of the sector. To address these concerns, diversifying the range of farmed species has been identified as a strategic priority to enhance the resilience and sustainability of aquaculture.
Domestication is a central strategy in this diversification effort, as it enables the development of production for new species. It is a gradual process by which a population adapts to captive conditions across generations, resulting in phenotypic changes driven by human control over resources, reproduction, and environmental conditions. These phenotypic shifts are also shaped by a combination of natural selection under farming conditions, the relaxation of selective pressures present in the wild, and deliberate artificial selection by humans.
Despite a growing body of research on animal domestication, the successful development of new fish species production remains a major challenge. Domestication is a complex, often poorly controlled process, and many attempts fail. These failures may stem from the species’ inability to adapt to rearing conditions, from unmet expectations regarding reproduction and growth or market value, or from economic, ethical (e.g., animal welfare), or regulatory constraints. Understanding the evolutionary dynamics of domestication and their drivers is therefore essential to support the diversification and sustainability of aquaculture.
Numerous studies have documented the consequences of domestication on fish phenotypes. Overall, domestication is known to affect behavior (e.g., increased docility, reduced predator avoidance), morphology (e.g., faster growth, reduced sensory structures and brain size, depigmentation), physiology (e.g., attenuated stress responses, altered immune function), and phenology (e.g., earlier sexual maturity). These changes may result from genetic alterations (e.g., selective sweeps, transcriptome alteration) or epigenetic mechanisms (e.g., changes in DNA methylation). However, our understanding of the domestication process and its effects remains incomplete. In particular, the influence of different aquaculture production systems on the trajectory of domestication, and the associated phenotypic and molecular mechanisms, has received limited attention in fish research.
Aquaculture production occurs under a wide range of conditions—intensive extensive, monoculture vs. polyculture, with formulated feed vs. live prey, in controlled indoor environments (e.g., recirculating aquaculture systems) or in uncontrolled outdoor systems (e.g., ponds), with or without selective breeding programs. These diverse conditions create a variety of selective environments, each potentially shaping different domestication trajectories and phenotypic outcomes over generations. Moreover, variations in environmental parameters across production systems can induce genetic and epigenetic modifications, even across generations.
Since domestication can lead to phenotypic changes that may either enhance or hinder aquaculture performance (e.g., in terms of predator avoidance, growth rate, stress response, reproductive capacity or disease resistance), investigating the potential for parallel (or divergent) evolution within a species under different farming conditions could provide critical insights. Such studies would help to identify (i) the consistent phenotypic consequences of domestication across systems, and (ii) whether specific farming practices are more likely to induce trait changes that are beneficial or detrimental for aquaculture.
Since , the laboratories L2A, URBE, IAM, and BAU have been jointly developing a research program as part of an international partnership between the University of Lorraine and the University of Namur. This program aims to better understand the process of fish domestication and its consequences during the very first generations born in captivity, using zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a model species.
Ph-D objective
The objective of the PhD project is to compare the phenotypic evolution and underlying molecular mechanisms in three zebrafish stocks derived from the same ancestral population but reared in three distinct domestication environments. These environments will be designed to mimic common aquaculture systems: (i) intensive monoculture, (ii) extensive monoculture, and (iii) intensive polyculture. Each will differ in practices such as environmental enrichment, feeding regime (artificial feed vs. live prey), and social composition.
Fish rearing will be conducted at the Plateforme Expérimentale en Aquaculture of the University of Lorraine by the Ph-D student and the L2A technical staff. The Ph-D student will develop an integrative phenotyping approach that considers key traits relevant to aquaculture, including growth, reproductive performance, stress responses, and aggressive behavior.
Given that adaptation during domestication may involve genetic, genomic, and epigenetic processes (e.g., genetic variation, selective sweeps, DNA methylation, transcriptome alteration), the Ph-D student will explore multiple molecular layers. This includes analyzing changes in genetic diversity and genome organization, variations in DNA methylation profiles, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic regulation.
Key references