Tool-Use Reasoning Failure Analysis Reviewer

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 55,000 - 96,000; Full time

Benefits offered by this job

Remote work (US-eligible)

Contractor role

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking a remote Tool-Use Reasoning Failure Analysis Reviewer to assess evaluation prompts and responses against our quality rubric.

You will compare paired outputs, assign severity tags, and write structured feedback for model retraining. Responsibilities include labeling hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags; calibrating scores against gold standards; and documenting recurring failure modes for rubric updates.

Qualifications

• Experience evaluating tool use reasoning failure analyses.
• Ability to apply multi-page rubrics consistently.
• Clear written rationale naming issues and rubric clauses.
• Strong attention to detail; flag prompt problems.
• Async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags.
• Compare paired responses and select the stronger with rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route to the program team.
• Calibrate reviewer-quality scores against gold-standard examples.
• Document recurring failure modes for rubric updates.

Skills

Tool Use Evaluation

Annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Rubric-based annotation

Remote work

Job description

Tool-Use Reasoning Failure Analysis Reviewer is a remote evaluation track for reviewing tool use reasoning failure analysis evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn tool use reasoning failure analysis evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate tool use reasoning failure analysis evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Tool-Use Reasoning Failure Analysis Reviewer assignments.


• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.


• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.


• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.


• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.


• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on tool use reasoning failure analysis evaluation or adjacent content for Tool-Use Reasoning Failure Analysis Reviewer work.


• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.


• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.


• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.


• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Compare two tool use reasoning failure analysis evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.


• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.


• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.


• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Nice to have

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.


• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.


• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Skills

• Model output evaluation


• Rubric-based annotation


• Severity tagging


• Inter-rater calibration


• Tool Use Reasoning Failure Analysis evaluation


• Frontier evaluation


• Rubric calibration


• Failure analysis


• Tool


• Reasoning

Work model

Remote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on tool use reasoning failure analysis evaluation or adjacent content for Tool-Use Reasoning Failure Analysis Reviewer work. Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches. Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied. Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem. Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.