Software Engineer, Python — Codebase Q&A

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 165,000 - 193,000; Part time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking a Software Engineer, Python to join a remote engineering review track that evaluates Python code, debugging traces, and AI outputs for real-world correctness. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Python model quality hinges on code that compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job Python experience—read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Python—Codebase Q&A work.
• Clear written reasoning—review notes must convince a senior engineer.
• Reliability for at least 10 hours per week and async availability.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce Python code outputs in a sandboxed environment.
• Grade Python solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate a bug.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale.
• Tag failure modes with severity scores.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

Python engineering

Job description

Software Engineer, Python — Codebase Q&A is a remote engineering review track for evaluating Python code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Category: Coding, SWE & Agent Evaluation · Pay: $130 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Software Engineer, Python — Codebase Q&A is a remote engineering review track for evaluating Python code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards.

About the role

Software Engineer, Python — Codebase Q&A is a remote engineering review track for evaluating Python code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.
Python model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.
Judge generated code and software engineering agents. Read their debugging traces.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce Python code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Software Engineer, Python — Codebase Q&A assignments.
• Grade python engineering solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Tag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.

Role details

Track Code review & evaluation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $130 / hr Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Strong day-job Python experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Software Engineer, Python — Codebase Q&A work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework. pytest, Jest, or JUnit. Go test, RSpec, or whatever you use.
• Clear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Reproduce a generated Python solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.
• Write the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.
• Compare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Triage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.

Useful experience

• Open-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.
• Experience with Python's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.
• Familiarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.

Compensation and schedule

$130 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Code review
• Debugging
• Unit testing
• Software engineering judgment
• Python engineering