Remote Mechanical Engineering Professor Derivation Reviewer

AuraOne; United States; On-site; USD 55,104 - 96,432; Part time

Job summary

AuraOne seeks an experienced Mechanical Engineering Professor reviewer to evaluate AI-derived outputs, reproduce key derivations, and document corrected reasoning for training models. You will work remotely as a CONTRACTOR, with at least 10 hours per week and async availability.

Responsibilities include reviewing derivations, reproducing claims, and adjudicating against textbooks or papers to ensure methodological accuracy and citation quality.

Qualifications

• Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in mechanical engineering or related field.
• Hands-on experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites methods, papers, or worked examples.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against mechanical engineering methods and prior work.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture corrected reasoning or worked examples for model training.
• Adjudicate disputed answers against textbooks, papers, or community standards.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in inter-rater calibration cycles.

Skills

Scientific reasoning

Method validation

Citation review

Quantitative analysis

Mechanical engineering

Education

Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in mechanical engineering or related field

Job description

AuraOne seeks an experienced Mechanical Engineering Professor reviewer to evaluate AI-derived outputs, reproduce key derivations, and document corrected reasoning for training models. You will work remotely as a CONTRACTOR, with at least 10 hours per week and async availability.

Responsibilities include reviewing derivations, reproducing claims, and adjudicating against textbooks or papers to ensure methodological accuracy and citation quality.