Remote Design Evaluation Lead - Rubric Architect

DesignMeshAI; United States; On-site; USD 110,208 - 206,640; Part time

Benefits offered by this job

Remote work

Job summary

DesignMeshAI is seeking an expert reviewer to evaluate real-world design work by developing task-specific grading criteria and scoring samples with rigorous, written justifications.

You will design precise rubrics for brand identity, campaign visuals, layout, packaging and digital assets, and apply consistent, defensible judgments across reviewers, incorporating feedback from senior reviewers to iterate criteria and scoring approaches.

Qualifications

• Demonstrated professional expertise in graphic, brand, or visual design.
• Craft knowledge across typography, layout, visual hierarchy, color, composition, and brand systems.
• Ability to articulate design critique clearly and precisely in writing, at the level of a design lead.
• Proven track record of consistent, detail-oriented judgment in a professional design context.

Responsibilities

• Design precise, task-specific grading rubrics for deliverables spanning brand identity, campaign visuals, layout, packaging, and digital assets
• Score work samples against established criteria with detailed, evidence-based written justifications for every rating
• Apply consistent evaluative judgment to ensure scores are reproducible and defensible across reviewers
• Incorporate structured feedback from senior reviewers and iterate rapidly on criteria and scoring approaches
• Maintain clear documentation of reasoning to support calibration and peer review processes

Skills

Graphic design

Brand design

Visual design

Typography

Layout

Job description

DesignMeshAI is seeking an expert reviewer to evaluate real-world design work by developing task-specific grading criteria and scoring samples with rigorous, written justifications.

You will design precise rubrics for brand identity, campaign visuals, layout, packaging and digital assets, and apply consistent, defensible judgments across reviewers, incorporating feedback from senior reviewers to iterate criteria and scoring approaches.