Nuclear Professional

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 351,000 - 475,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. seeks a Nuclear Professional contractor to assess AI outputs in nuclear science reasoning, calculations, and research workflows.

You will reproduce key derivations, audit methodologies, and document corrected reasoning so the modeling team can train on the right methods. This remote, US-eligible role requires graduate-level nuclear science expertise, precise written reasoning with citations, and reliable availability of at least 10 hours per week.

Qualifications

• Graduate-level training or equivalent experience in nuclear science.
• Experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Ability to apply rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear, cited written reasoning with methods and sources.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against nuclear science methods, conventions, and prior work.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or experimental claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture corrected reasoning or worked examples for training.
• Adjudicate disputed answers against textbooks, papers, or community standards.
• Maintain reviewer quality scores in calibration cycles.

Skills

Scientific reasoning

Method validation

Citation review

Quantitative analysis

Nuclear science

Education

Graduate-level training in nuclear science

Job description

Nuclear Professional is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across nuclear science reasoning, calculations, and research workflows. Reviewers grade derivations and assumptions, reproduce key results, and document the correct method so the modeling team can train on it.

Why this role matters

Nuclear science models live or die on whether their derivations actually hold up under scrutiny. AuraOne uses scientific specialists to grade outputs the way a peer reviewer would — checking assumptions, reproducing key steps, and capturing the right method alongside the wrong one.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current nuclear science methods, conventions, and prior work for Nuclear Professional assignments.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or experimental claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture the corrected reasoning or worked example so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed answers against textbooks, papers, or community standards.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in inter-rater calibration cycles.

Qualifications

• Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in nuclear science or a closely related field for Nuclear Professional work.
• Hands-on experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites methods, papers, or worked examples.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Reproduce a nuclear science derivation from a model output and flag any algebraic or dimensional errors.
• Grade a model's literature summary against the cited papers and rate the citation quality.
• Adjudicate a disputed answer between two reviewers using textbook methods.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Nice to have

• PhD, postdoc, or industry research experience in the topic area.
• Prior work reviewing AI-assisted research tooling and its failure modes.
• Multilingual fluency for non-English papers and corpora.

Skills

• Scientific reasoning
• Method validation
• Citation review
• Quantitative analysis
• Nuclear science

Work model

Remote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

$300 / hr