Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 90,000 - 103,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne seeks a Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle contractor to evaluate production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs for real-world correctness. Reviewers reproduce failures and write unit tests to demonstrate gaps, guiding the modeling team to the fix.

Role emphasizes code that compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases; you will judge outputs and write concise reasoning as part of the evaluation.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job engineering experience; you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec, etc.).
• Clear written reasoning so your review note convinces a senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle assignments.
• Grade nuclear engineer fuel cycle engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

Nuclear Engineer Fuel Cycle eng review

Job description

Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Category: Coding, SWE & Agent Evaluation · Pay: $65-$75 / hr · Location: Remote - US-eligible · Contractor

Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Role details

About the role

Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.
Engineering model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.
Judge generated code and software engineering agents. Read their debugging traces.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle assignments.
• Grade nuclear engineer fuel cycle engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.Track Code review & evaluation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $65-$75 / hr Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Strong day-job engineering experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Nuclear Engineer, Fuel Cycle work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework. pytest, Jest, or JUnit. Go test, RSpec, or whatever you use.
• Clear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Reproduce a generated engineering solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.
• Write the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.
• Compare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Triage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.

Useful experience

• Open-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.
• Experience with the target language's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.
• Familiarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.

Compensation and schedule

$65-$75 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Code review
• Debugging
• Unit testing
• Software engineering judgment
• Nuclear Engineer Fuel Cycle engineering review