.NET Developer

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 69,000 - 165,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking a skilled .NET Developer reviewer for a remote engineering track. You will reproduce failures, write the minimal failing tests, and explain fixes to guide the modeling team toward correct responses.

The contractor role emphasizes strong .NET expertise, timely test writing, and clear reasoning in review notes. Remote work is supported with US eligibility, and task volume varies by program demand.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job .NET experience
• Comfort writing concise unit tests
• Familiarity with a testing framework (pytest/Jest/JUnit)
• Clear written reasoning in reviews
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce .NET code outputs in a sandboxed environment for .NET Developer assignments
• Grade .net developer engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling
• Write minimal failing tests demonstrating bugs
• Compare paired solutions and rank with a written rubric rationale
• Tag failure modes with severity scores

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

.Net Developer engineering review

API Integrations

FastAPI

.NET

Tools

pytest

Jest

JUnit

Go test

RSpec

Job description

.NET Developer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating .NET code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Category: Coding, SWE & Agent Evaluation · Pay: $50–$120 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

.

Role details

About the role

.NET Developer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating .NET code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.
.NET model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.
Judge generated code and software engineering agents. Read their debugging traces.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce .NET code outputs in a sandboxed environment for .NET Developer assignments.
• Grade .net developer engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Tag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.

What you should bring

• Strong day-job .NET experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for .NET Developer work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework. pytest, Jest, or JUnit. Go test, RSpec, or whatever you use.
• Clear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Reproduce a generated .NET solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.
• Write the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.
• Compare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Triage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.

Useful experience

• Open-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.
• Experience with .NET's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.
• Familiarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.

Compensation and schedule

$50–$120 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Code review
• Debugging
• Unit testing
• Software engineering judgment
• .Net Developer engineering review
• API Integrations
• FastAPI
• .NET