.NET Engineer

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 165,000 - 193,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs seeks a remote contractor for evaluating .NET code, debugging traces, and AI-generated outputs to ensure real-world correctness. You will reproduce failures, craft unit tests, and explain fixes to guide the modeling team in targeting gaps.

The role emphasizes grading outputs like a seasoned code reviewer, with the ability to write concise tests and document failure modes for continuous improvement.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job .NET experience; ability to read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for .NET Engineer work.
• Clear written reasoning to convince senior engineers.
• Familiarity with testing frameworks and unit-test design.
• Experience reviewing AI-generated outputs and grading against standards.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce .NET code outputs in sandboxed environments.
• Grade .NET engineer outputs for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests to demonstrate bugs.
• Compare paired solutions and provide rationale tied to rubric.
• Tag failure modes with severity scores (compile error, runtime crash, etc.).

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

.NET Engineer engineering review

Tools

pytest

Jest

JUnit

Go test

RSpec

Job description

.NET Engineer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating .NET code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Category: Coding, SWE & Agent Evaluation Pay: $130 / hr Location: Remote - US-eligible Contractor

.

Role details

Track Code review & evaluation

About the role

.NET Engineer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating .NET code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.
.NET model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.
Judge generated code and software engineering agents. Read their debugging traces.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce .NET code outputs in a sandboxed environment for .NET Engineer assignments.
• Grade .net engineer engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Tag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.

What you should bring

• Strong day-job .NET experience - you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for .NET Engineer work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework. pytest, Jest, or JUnit. Go test, RSpec, or whatever you use.
• Clear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Reproduce a generated .NET solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.
• Write the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.
• Compare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Triage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.

Useful experience

• Open-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.
• Experience with .NET's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.
• Familiarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.

Compensation and schedule

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Code review
• Debugging
• Unit testing
• Software engineering judgment
• .NET Engineer engineering review