Debugging Trace Workflow Reviewer

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 28,000 - 62,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking an AI data reviewer to help turn debugging trace outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for the AuraOne Human Data program.

Your work will involve evaluating model outputs against a versioned rubric, tagging severity, labeling content issues, and providing written rationales. This is a remote contractor role requiring US work eligibility and at least 10 hours per week.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation/annotation experience on debugging trace workflow evaluation.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate debugging trace workflow evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Skills

Model output evaluation

Rubric-based annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Debugging Trace Workflow evaluation

Code review

Software testing

Agent evaluation

Debugging

Trace

Job description

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn debugging trace workflow evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate debugging trace workflow evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Debugging Trace Workflow Reviewer assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on debugging trace workflow evaluation or adjacent content for Debugging Trace Workflow Reviewer work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Compare two debugging trace workflow evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Nice to have

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Skills

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Debugging Trace Workflow evaluation
• Code review
• Software testing
• Agent evaluation
• Debugging
• Trace

Work model

Remote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.