Counsel / Senior Counsel - Data Licensing and Commercial Contracts

Latitude Legal (recruiting for a leading global financial services and data organization); New York (NY); Vor Ort; USD 165.000 - 200.000; Vollzeit

Benefits dieser Stelle

Annual bonus

Equity potential

Medical/dental/vision benefits

Zusammenfassung

Latitude Legal is recruiting for a Counsel / Senior Counsel specializing in Data Licensing and Commercial Contracts in Midtown Manhattan, NY. The role is permanent, in-house, full-time, with a base salary of $165,000–$200,000 and potential annual incentives and equity.

The successful candidate will manage market data licenses, redistribution arrangements, and exchange agreements, while shaping AI-enabled contract workflows and playbooks.

Qualifikationen

• J.D. with active New York Bar admission is required.
• 3+ years of relevant legal experience in data licensing or financial services.
• Experience drafting and negotiating market/data licenses and related agreements.
• Ability to advise on regulatory and compliance considerations in contracts.

Aufgaben

• Draft, review, and negotiate market data licenses, exchange agreements, and distributions.
• Advise on commercial terms, data usage, and liability structures across jurisdictions.
• Play a hands-on role in applying AI/CLM tools to contract workflows and playbooks.
• Collaborate across time zones and support senior stakeholders in strategic negotiations.

Kenntnisse

Commercial licensing

Contract drafting & negotiation

Legal advisory

Market data experience

Regulatory/financial servicesknowledge

Ausbildung

J.D. with NY Bar admission

Tools

AI CLM tools

Jobbeschreibung

This opportunity was posted more than 30 days ago and no application deadline was provided. You can explore active listings below.

jobs Verified: 18 Aug 2026 New York, NY (Midtown Manhattan, In‑Office 5 days/week)

Counsel / Senior Counsel - Data Licensing and Commercial Contracts

Organising Institution / Firm

Latitude Legal (recruiting for a leading global financial services and data organization)

Not Specified by Organiser

New York, NY (Midtown Manhattan, In‑Office 5 days/week)

J.D. with active admission to the New York Bar; 3+ years of relevant legal experience; demonstrated expertise in commercial licensing, contract drafting and negotiation, and legal advisory work, ideally at a financial services, financial data or financial technology company and/or an Am Law firm or strong boutique; hands‑on experience with market data, global exchanges, and financial services/markets preferred; excellent written and verbal communication skills; proven negotiation skills; business‑minded, solution‑oriented approach; ability to work independently and collaborate across international time zones; outstanding professional references.

Permanent In‑House Counsel Position

Breaking Into Elite In‑House Roles: The Data Licensing Counsel Opportunity at a Global Financial Powerhouse

The legal recruitment landscape is signaling a definitive shift: the most coveted in‑house roles are no longer generalist positions but highly specialized posts sitting at the intersection of commercial contracts, financial regulation, and cutting‑edge technology. The Counsel / Senior Counsel - Data Licensing and Commercial Contracts role currently being recruited by Latitude Legal for a leading global financial services and data organization epitomizes this evolution. Based in the heart of Midtown Manhattan, this permanent, full‑time position offers a base salary range of $165,000 to $200,000—supplemented by annual cash incentives and potential equity—placing it firmly in the upper echelon of in‑house compensation packages for the 3‑7 year PQE bracket.

Strategic Insight: This is not merely a contract management role. The mandate explicitly includes shaping the legal department's adoption of AI for contract review, workflow automation, and template development. For the ambitious lawyer, this signals a rare opportunity to build a "legal operations + substantive expertise" hybrid profile that is currently the most marketable asset in the legal job market.

Why Data Licensing is the New Crown Jewel of Commercial Practice

To understand the weight of this opportunity, one must appreciate the strategic centrality of data licensing in the modern financial ecosystem. The hiring organization describes itself as a "global financial services and data organization." In this context, data is not a byproduct; it is the core inventory. The Counsel hired here will not be reviewing standard vendor agreements in isolation. They will be drafting, reviewing, and negotiating market data licenses, financial product licenses, redistribution arrangements, and exchange agreements across global markets.

This requires a nuanced understanding of the market data ecosystem—the flow of real‑time and reference data from exchanges (NYSE, NASDAQ, CME, LSE, etc.) through redistributors to end‑users (asset managers, banks, fintechs). The contracts governing this flow are among the most complex in commercial law, involving intricate fee structures, audit rights, permitted use restrictions, liability caps calibrated for systemic risk, and compliance with exchange rules and SEC/MSRB regulations. Mastering this niche makes a lawyer virtually recession‑proof, as the demand for data—and the legal frameworks governing it—only intensifies during market volatility.

Deconstructing the Mandate: What "Good" Looks Like for This Role

The job description outlines a hands‑on individual‑contributor position with a clear path to growing within the team. This phrasing is deliberate. It signals that the organization values technical legal craftsmanship over pure management at this stage, but has budgeted for leadership growth. The "Basic Requirements" section reveals the non‑negotiables:

• NY Bar Admission & 3+ Years PQE: Hard floor. No exceptions for pending admission or equivalent foreign qualification without NY admission.
• Pedigree Proxy: "Financial services/financial data/fintech company AND/OR Am Law firm or strong boutique." This is a pedigree filter. If you are at a regional firm or a general corporate in‑house role without financial regulatory exposure, you must demonstrate transferable complexity—e.g., negotiating enterprise SaaS agreements with data processing addendums for regulated clients.
• Market Data Fluency: "Hands‑on experience with market data, global exchanges... preferred." This is the differentiator. If you have it, lead with it. If not, your cover letter must bridge the gap immediately (e.g., "While my primary experience is in technology licensing for a Tier‑1 investment bank, I have negotiated data processing agreements with Bloomberg/Refinitiv/S&P vendors...").
• AI & Legal Innovation: The explicit requirement to "help shape how the legal team adopts AI" transforms this from a pure lawyering role into a legal transformation role. Candidates should prepare concrete examples of using CLM tools (Ironclad, ContractPod, Agiloft), AI review platforms (Kira, Luminance, Harvey), or building prompt libraries for contract playbooks.

Compensation Architecture: Decoding the $165K-$200K Band

The transparency of the salary band is a hallmark of sophisticated in‑house hiring. The $35,000 spread reflects the "Counsel vs. Senior Counsel" bifurcation. Here is how to self‑assess where you land:

• $165K-$180K (Counsel Band): Typically 3-5 years PQE. High‑volume commercial negotiation experience. Strong drafting. Limited people management. Requires mentorship on strategic/escalated matters.
• $185K-$200K (Senior Counsel Band): Typically 5-8 years PQE. Proven track record leading complex, multi‑party negotiations (e.g., exchange agreement renewals, strategic data partnerships). Experience mentoring juniors. Comfortable advising C‑suite/Board level stakeholders. Demonstrated process improvement initiatives.

Crucially, the package includes annual cash incentive (bonus) and potential equity. In a financial data organization, equity—even at the Counsel level—can be materially valuable given the sector's M&A activity and private equity interest. The benefits suite (medical/dental/vision/life/disability, 401k, generous leave) aligns with top‑tier financial services employers.

The Five‑Day In‑Office Mandate: A Strategic Career Signal

The requirement to be in‑office five days per week in Midtown Manhattan is a non‑negotiable cultural marker. While hybrid models dominate legal departments post‑pandemic, a full return‑to‑office mandate at this seniority level usually indicates one of three organizational realities:

• Apprenticeship Culture: The legal team believes complex negotiation strategy and regulatory judgment are best transmitted through osmosis—sitting next to the GC/Deputy GC during live negotiations.
• Cross‑Functional Integration: The role sits embedded with Sales, Product, Finance, and Data Governance. Physical proximity to these revenue‑generating units is deemed essential for the "timely, business‑oriented legal advice" the job demands.
• Information Security Posture: Handling exchange agreements and market data licenses often involve MNPI (Material Non‑Public Information) and exchange‑confidential terms. A controlled office environment simplifies compliance.

For the candidate, this mandate is a feature, not a bug. It guarantees high‑touch exposure to decision‑makers—a career accelerator that remote roles often struggle to replicate.

Crafting a Winning Application: The Latitude Legal Playbook

Since the application flows through LinkedIn to Latitude Legal, your profile and materials must pass two filters: the Latitude recruiter's screen and the client's hiring committee. Here is a tactical preparation guide:

1. LinkedIn Profile Optimization (The First Filter)

• Headline: "Commercial Counsel | Data Licensing & Financial Services Contracts | NY Bar | AI Legal Ops Advocate" — keyword‑load for recruiter search algorithms.
• Experience Bullets: Quantify. "Negotiated 50+ market data license agreements annually with top‑tier exchanges (NYSE, ICE, CME), reducing cycle time by 30% via playbook implementation." "Advised product teams on GDPR/CCPA compliance for new data analytics features."
• Skills Section: Pin "Data Licensing," "Financial Services Regulation," "Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)," "Generative AI for Legal," "Exchange Agreements."

2. The Cover Letter Narrative (The Differentiator)

Do not rehash your resume. Write a 300-word strategic memo addressing the three pillars of the role:

Your mandate sits at the nexus of three forces reshaping legal practice: the commoditization of market data, the regulatory scrutiny of financial data infrastructure, and the AI‑driven transformation of commercial contracting. In my current role at [Firm/Company], I have navigated all three—leading the renegotiation of our global exchange data framework (covering $XM in annual spend), building a CLM workflow that cut review time by 40%, and piloting an LLM‑based first‑pass review for vendor DPAs. I am seeking a permanent home where this hybrid expertise drives strategic value daily, not as a project, but as the core mandate. The five‑day in‑office culture in Midtown is precisely the environment where I operate at my highest level.

3. Interview Preparation: The "Business‑Minded" Litmus Test

The job description repeats "business‑mind‑ed, solution‑oriented" twice. Expect hypotheticals like:

• "Sales wants to close a deal with a strategic fintech partner by Friday. The partner refuses our standard liability cap and audit clause. The data involves exchange‑licensed content. Walk me through your analysis and recommendation."
• "We are launching an AI‑derived analytics product trained on licensed market data. The exchange agreements are silent on AI training rights. How do you structure the legal analysis and stakeholder communication?"

Your answers must demonstrate legal accuracy + commercial pragmatism + stakeholder empathy. The "correct" legal answer that kills the deal is the wrong answer in this role.

Long‑Term Career Trajectory: Where This Role Leads

Accepting this position positions you for a narrow but elite set of exit opportunities:

• Deputy General Counsel / Head of Commercial Legal at a Fintech Unicorn or Data Provider (e.g., Bloomberg, Refinitiv/LSEG, S&P, FactSet, Morningstar).
• Chief Legal Officer at a Series C+ Fintech/Data Infrastructure startup.
• Partner Track Return to an Am Law 50 firm's Financial Services Regulatory or Technology Transactions practice—with a "client‑side" credential that makes you an immediate rainmaker asset.
• Legal Operations / Legal Transformation Leadership roles leveraging the AI innovation mandate.

The combination of financial services regulatory depth + data licensing specialization + AI/legal ops fluency is arguably the single most valuable legal skillset in the 2025‑2030 market.

Final Verdict: A Rare "Buy" Signal in the Lateral Market

In a lateral market often characterized by lateral shuffles between similar roles, this posting represents a genuine step‑change opportunity. The client is a market leader; the recruiter is elite; the compensation is top‑decile; the mandate is expansive; and the specialization is future‑proof. For the NY‑admitted commercial lawyer with 3+ years of experience who has touched financial data, technology contracts, or complex licensing—this is the role you update your resume for. The five‑day commute to Midtown is the price of admission for a seat at the table where the future of financial data law is being written.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: I am admitted in New Jersey/Connecticut but not New York. Can I apply pending NY admission?

A: The job description explicitly requires "active admission to the New York Bar." For a permanent in‑house role at a financial services firm in Manhattan involving exchange agreements and regulatory compliance, NY admission is almost certainly a hard regulatory and insurance requirement, not a preference. You should secure NY admission (via reciprocity/UBE transfer or exam) before applying, or clearly state your admission timeline (e.g., "NY Bar application filed, admission expected [Month/Year]") in your cover letter. Latitude Legal recruiters may keep you in their pipeline for future roles if your timeline is credible.

Q: My experience is in general commercial contracts/SaaS agreements at a tech company, not financial data licensing. Am I competitive?

A: You are competitive if you can demonstrate transferable complexity. The key bridges are: (1) Experience negotiating agreements with data processing addendums (DPAs), data residency, and usage restriction clauses—the mechanics are similar to data licenses. (2) Exposure to regulated industry compliance (healthcare/HIPAA, insurance, fintech) proving you can navigate regulatory constraints in contracts. (3) High‑volume, high‑velocity negotiation metrics. In your application, explicitly map your SaaS clauses (IP ownership, SLAs, liability caps, audit rights) to the data licensing analogs (data ownership, service levels, liability for data errors, exchange audit rights). The "AI legal innovation" mandate is your strongest lever—lead with that.

Q: What is the realistic timeline for the hiring process through Latitude Legal?

A: As a Chambers‑ranked search firm managing a permanent placement for a blue‑chip client, Latitude typically runs a tight, professional process: Week 1-2: Recruiter screen (30 mins) → Candidate shortlist sent to client. Week 3-4: First round interviews (virtual/phone with hiring manager + peer). Week 5-6: Final round (on‑site in Midtown, panel with GC, stakeholders, potential team members). Week 7: Offer/Reference check. The "1 day ago" posting timestamp suggests the process is just initiating. Applying immediately positions you in the first wave of candidates reviewed.

Q: Does the "potential equity incentive" imply this is a pre‑IPO or private equity‑backed company?

A: Not necessarily. Many large, public financial services and data organizations (e.g., S&P Global, Moody's, FactSet, Morningstar, exchanges like ICE/CME/NASDAQ) grant Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) or Performance Share Units (PSUs) to Counsel‑level and above employees as standard long‑term incentive compensation. The phrasing "potentially equity incentive" likely reflects that the final grant size/eligibility is calibrated to the final title determination (Counsel vs. Senior Counsel) and internal compensation committee approval cycles. It is a standard, valuable component of total compensation in this sector, not a signal of corporate structure instability.