C Code Review Engineer (Remote, Contract)

AuraOne; United States; On-site; USD 68,880 - 165,312; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne is seeking an experienced C Programmer to remotely review produced code, reproduce results, and grade solutions for accuracy and robustness. You will write minimal failing tests and document edge cases to guide model improvements.

The role focuses on compiling, debugging, and evaluating code across various tasks, with an emphasis on clear, implementable fixes and thoughtful rationale for the grading rubric.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job engineering experience—you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for C Programmer work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec, or equivalent.
• Clear written reasoning—your review note has to convince another senior engineer.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for C Programmer assignments.
• Grade C engineering solutions for correctness, complexity, idiomatic style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Tag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.
• Document recurring code-generation failures so the modeling team can target them.
• Calibrate against gold-standard reviews to keep inter-rater agreement above target.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgement

C engineering

C Programmer

Job description

AuraOne is seeking an experienced C Programmer to remotely review produced code, reproduce results, and grade solutions for accuracy and robustness. You will write minimal failing tests and document edge cases to guide model improvements.

The role focuses on compiling, debugging, and evaluating code across various tasks, with an emphasis on clear, implementable fixes and thoughtful rationale for the grading rubric.