Remote Full-Stack Code Reviewer & Debugger

AuraOne; United States; On-site; USD 68,880 - 165,312; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne is seeking a Full Stack Developer for a remote engineering review track. You will evaluate production code, debug traces, and AI outputs for real-world correctness.

Reproduce failures, write the unit tests the model should have written, and explain fixes so the team can target gaps. Responsibilities include grading solutions for correctness, complexity, idiomatic style, and edge-case handling; writing minimal failing tests; and documenting recurring failures to improve future reviews.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job engineering experience — read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Full Stack Developer work.
• Concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with at least one testing framework (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec, etc.).
• Clear written reasoning that convinces a senior engineer.
• Ability to work asynchronously for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Full Stack Developer assignments.
• Grade full-stack engineering solutions for correctness, complexity, idiomatic style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Tag failure modes with severity scores.
• Document recurring code-generation failures for the modeling team.
• Calibrate reviews to maintain high inter-rater agreement.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

Full-stack engineering

Angular

API Integrations

FastAPI

GoLang

Nest.js

Node.js

React

Job description

AuraOne is seeking a Full Stack Developer for a remote engineering review track. You will evaluate production code, debug traces, and AI outputs for real-world correctness.

Reproduce failures, write the unit tests the model should have written, and explain fixes so the team can target gaps. Responsibilities include grading solutions for correctness, complexity, idiomatic style, and edge-case handling; writing minimal failing tests; and documenting recurring failures to improve future reviews.