Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 55,000 - 83,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. invites a meticulous Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer to work remotely on evaluating model outputs against AuraOne's quality rubric.

You will compare paired responses, label edge cases, and write structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain. In this CONTRACTOR role, you will maintain reviewer-quality scores, flag issues with rubric clauses, and document recurring failure modes for future training.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation or adjacent content for Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer work.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Skills

Model output evaluation

Rubric-based annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis

Frontier evaluation

Rubric calibration

Failure analysis

Benchmark

Regression

Job description

Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer is a remote evaluation track for reviewing benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation or adjacent content for Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Compare two benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Nice to have

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Skills

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis evaluation
• Frontier evaluation
• Rubric calibration
• Failure analysis
• Benchmark
• Regression

Work model

Remote — US-eligible. Remote Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on benchmark regression failure analysis evaluation or adjacent content for Benchmark Regression Failure Analysis Reviewer work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.