Legal

Complied AI; India; Remote; INR 800,000 - 1,200,000; Full time

Job summary

Complied AI seeks a law-trained reviewer to ensure our readings of Acts and regulations stay faithful to the source. You will compare published summaries with the text, flag deviations, and guard against oversimplification when readers ask questions.

Remote from India, this full-time role involves testing Q&A for dangerous interpretations and helping set rules for when to show the text rather than give advice.

Qualifications

• Law graduate with strong research skills.
• Ability to read statutes closely and explain subtle differences.
• Attention to precision and harmful misinterpretations.

Responsibilities

• Read Acts and regulations against the source to verify faithful representation.
• Review how provisions, cross-references, and exceptions are presented.
• Flag oversimplifications and areas where plain meaning diverges from working meaning.
• Pressure-test the Q&A content to identify dangerous interpretations.
• Help set rules for when to show the text and when to refrain from giving advice.

Skills

Legal research

Statutory interpretation

Risk assessment

Education

LLB or equivalent

Job description

Check that our reading of Acts and regulations stays faithful to the source.

Summarising the law is where meaning leaks. A word dropped, a qualifier softened, a general rule stated without its exception, and a summary that looks fine now says something the Act does not. When the product also lets people ask questions and get answers, that risk compounds. Your job is to catch it before a reader does.

You would read what we publish against the source and tell us where the plain meaning and the working meaning part ways. You would review how we present provisions, cross-references, and exceptions, and flag anywhere we have oversimplified into being wrong. You would pressure-test the Q&A on the areas where a confident answer is most dangerous, and help us set rules for when the honest move is to show the text and step back. And you would help us think about the lines a product like this should not cross, so we stay a reading and reference tool and do not drift into giving advice we are not placed to give.

You are trained in law and read statutes closely for a living or did recently, whether in practice, in-house, or research. You do not need to write code. You need to read carefully, argue precisely, and explain a subtle error in a way a non-lawyer can act on.

Full-time, remote (India), and paid. If a sloppy paraphrase of a section bothers you more than it probably should, you are the person we are looking for.

About you Incomplete

Share something you have built, shipped, or handled that you are proud of. A link is welcome.

What pulls you toward Indian statutory and compliance work?

Where in India would you work from, and which timezone do you keep day to day?

When could you start in a full-time role?

About the Legal role Incomplete

Tell us about a time you read an Act closely and found the plain meaning was not the working meaning.

Pick a regulation you know well. Where do people most often misread it?

How do you check whether a summary of a law is faithful to the source?

Where does a product like ours risk getting the law wrong, and how would you guard against it?

What is a piece of legal writing you think is genuinely well done, and why?