Head of Quality Assurance Testing - IO Tech Solutions

IO Tech Solutions Limited; Hong Kong; On-site; HKD 1,000,000 - 1,500,000; Full time

Job summary

IO Tech Solutions Limited seeks a Head of Quality Assurance Testing to lead the QRE team and own testing strategy, platform, and release quality across the product. You will drive automated testing, CI integration, and incident management while coordinating with engineering leadership.

You will define quality gates, observability standards, and diagnostic tooling, ensuring reliability across multi-region services and fast, safe shipping.

Qualifications

• 10+ years in software engineering or quality engineering, with at least 3–4 years in a leadership role.

Responsibilities

• Own testing framework and CI integration for daily use by engineers.
• Drive automated and proactive testing, including regression and exploratory programs.
• Define release quality policy and enforce pipeline gates and rollback criteria.
• Own observability infrastructure, logging, metrics, tracing, and alerting for diagnosability.
• Coordinate end-to-end incident response, postmortems, and learning-driven improvements.
• Translate quality and availability metrics into leadership-friendly business terms.

Skills

Leadership

Quality engineering

Production reliability

CI/CD

Test automation

Incident management

Observability

Tools

Playwright

Job description

Head of Quality Assurance Testing - IO Tech Solutions

You will lead Quality & Reliability Engineering (QRE) — the team responsible for product quality

and production reliability across SleekFlow. You own the testing strategy, the test platform,

release quality gates, observability and diagnostic tooling, incident management, and availability

reporting. You report to engineering leadership.

What you'll own

● Framework Ownership: Builds and maintains the E2E frameworks, CI integration, and

test-data management used daily by application engineers.

● Automated & Proactive Testing: Drives continuous, multi-tiered regression testing based

on real production patterns, and leads pre-release and exploratory testing programs.

● Shared Responsibility: The platform team provides the infrastructure and framework,

while application engineers write the actual feature tests.

2. Release Quality & Delivery

● Policy Setting: Defines the release-quality policy (which gates a release, which test

suites run, and how rollbacks are triggered) based on the change's risk level.

● Pipeline Enforcement: Owns what the pipeline enforces, while release engineers

3. Observability & Diagnostic Tooling

● Platform & Standards: Owns the infrastructure and standards for structured logging,

metrics, tracing, and alerting to ensure production issues are easily diagnosable.

● Data Pipelines: Manages the tools and pipelines, while separate application and platform

teams handle the actual instrumentation of their services.

● Lifecycle Ownership: Coordinates the entire response for all production incidents

(severity classification, stakeholder communication, and postmortems) regardless of the

● Continuous Learning: Tracks post-incident follow-ups and feeds lessons learned back

into testing and monitoring improvements. (The team that caused the issue owns the fix).

● Target Definition: Co-defines system availability, degradation, and downtime targets with

leadership.

● Metrics & Reporting: Translates definitions into measurable SLIs and health signals,

builds operational dashboards, and produces regular reliability reports to guide quality

investments.

What we’re looking for

10+ years in software engineering, quality engineering, or production reliability, with at least 3–4

years in a leadership role (managing people, setting org-level strategy, influencing cross-team

decisions).

You’ve worked across both quality engineering and production reliability — either in separate

roles or combined. You understand how product quality and site reliability reinforce each other

and can explain that to an engineering org.

Specific experience we value:

● Designing tiered regression strategies — deciding what to run per repo or change class

in CI/CD so delivery stays fast without blind spots.

● Running incident response end-to-end — from detection to postmortem to tracked

prevention — for a multi-service, multi-region SaaS product.

● Building or scaling a test automation platform used by other engineers daily (E2E

frameworks, CI pipelines, test-data management, flake policy).

● Building or owning observability infrastructure — structured logging, distributed tracing,

metrics pipelines, and alerting — that engineers rely on daily to diagnose production

issues.

● Defining availability or reliability metrics (SLIs, SLOs, or equivalent) and making them

mean something to leadership — not just dashboards that exist but that nobody trusts.

● Operating in a fast-shipping engineering culture where features are built in days, specs

are often thin, and the quality model has to keep pace.

● You translate between “5xx on service X” and “inbox is broken for customers.” You

present quality and availability to leadership in business terms and work with engineers

in technical terms. You’re comfortable being the person who says “this isn’t ready to

ship” when it matters.

Nice to have

● Hands-on with Playwright or similar modern E2E frameworks and CI-driven test

● Experience with multi-region SaaS (Azure preferred, but cloud-native fundamentals

transfer).

● Experience with structured pre-release testing programs (internal beta, dogfooding) at a

product company.

● Experience co-defining customer-facing SLAs or availability reporting with product or

leadership.

Unlock job insights

Hirer responsiveness Salary match Number of applicants

Be careful This job ad has not been subjected to our hirer verification process. Proceed cautiously and do your own checks before providing any personal information. Learn how to protect yourself Report this job ad Your email address Reason for reporting job Additional comments To help fast track investigation, please include here any other relevant details that prompted you to report this job ad as fraudulent / misleading / discriminatory / salary below minimum wage.

Researching careers? Find all the information and tips you need on career advice.