Radiological Safety Expert - Redteaming

Obsidian

Paris

Sur place

EUR 70 000 - 110 000

Plein temps

14 jours+
Générateur de candidature

Une candidature sur mesure pour ce poste — un CV personnalisé et une lettre de motivation qui correspondent directement à l’offre.

Passez les filtres ATS

Résumé du poste

Mercor is assembling a panel of radiological safety experts to red-team frontier AI models. You will write challenging prompts across benign, dual-use, and adversarial levels, focusing on radioactive materials and safety policies.

You will evaluate model responses, judge adherence to safety standards, and draft reference answers with clear rationales for correct handling.

Qualifications

  • Experience in radioactive material handling, licensing, or security and response.
  • Ability to distinguish routine professional questions from dual-use or dangerous inquiries.
  • Strong technical writing and rationale for decisions.

Responsabilités

  • Write challenging single-turn prompts across benign, dual-use, and adversarial levels.
  • Evaluate model responses against defined policy standards.
  • Draft reference answers and technical reasoning for correct handling.

Connaissances

Radiation safety
Red-teaming
Technical writing
Policy evaluation

Formation

Background in radiation safety

Description du poste

About the work

Mercor is assembling a panel of radiological safety experts to red-team frontier AI models. The goal is to test whether a model can correctly judge the misuse potential of a technical request while answering legitimate questions fully while refusing genuinely dangerous ones.

You will:

  • Write challenging single-turn prompts in your domain, labelled across three levels: benign, dual-use, and adversarial.

  • Evaluate the responses that come back against a defined policy standard, and judge whether each was handled correctly.

  • Write the reference answer ; what a correct response looks like, and the technical reasoning for why.

This domain lives on the dual-use line more than most. The same isotope underpins cancer therapy and industrial radiography; the same shielding calculation protects a worker and conceals a source. A model that refuses a routine dose question is failing as badly as one that answers a question it shouldn't. Drawing that line reliably is why we need practitioners rather than generalists.

Background we're looking for

We're looking for people who have held responsibility for radioactive material, not just worked near it; source custody, licensing, or the security and response side. What matters most is being able to tell a routine professional question from one that's fishing for something else: the same shielding calculation protects a worker and conceals a source, They will be writing prompts that sit exactly on that line, then judging whether the model held it. Examples of relevant backgrounds (Ideally w/Red-teaming experience):Radiation Safety Officer (broad-scope licensee) - holds the licence of record; acquisition, inventory, transfer and disposal.Health Physicist (DOE site or national lab) - survey, assay, contamination control and dose planning in high-hazard facilities.Source Security / Vulnerability Assessment Specialist - has assessed how Category 1 and 2 sources get stolen, shielded or moved.Radiological Emergency Response Specialist - FRMAC, CBRN response, dispersal and contamination modelling.Nuclear Medicine Physicist / Cyclotron RSO - medical isotope production and handling; the legitimate-use half of the dual-use line.

What this role demands beyond technical depth

This is writing-intensive work. Every judgment you make needs a written rationale that a non-specialist can follow. Prior technical writing, published research, or expert witness experience is a strong signal; please include a sample or link. You will also be reading and writing about misuse scenarios in your field for sustained periods. We brief experts on this in advance, and you can pause or step away at any point without penalty.

Before you apply

Your work here will not involve, and must not draw on, classified or export-controlled information, or anything covered by an NDA or prepublication review obligation. If you hold such obligations you may still be a good fit; tell us in your application and we will scope the work accordingly.

Obtenez votre examen gratuit et confidentiel de votre CV.

ou faites glisser et déposez votre fichier ici.

Similar jobs

Postes similaires à comparer

Radiological Safety Expert - Redteaming
Radiological Safety Expert - Redteaming

Mercor • Paris

Sur place
EUR 60 000 - 90 000
Radiation Safety Specialist - Fully Remote
Radiation Safety Specialist - Fully Remote

Mercor • Paris

À distance
EUR 55 000 - 70 000
Nuclear Security Expert - Red Team
Nuclear Security Expert - Red Team

Obsidian • Paris

Sur place
EUR 70 000 - 90 000
Nuclear Security Expert - Red Team
Nuclear Security Expert - Red Team

Mercor • Paris

Sur place
EUR 45 000 - 65 000
Nuclear Forensics Expert - Safeguards
Nuclear Forensics Expert - Safeguards

Obsidian • Paris

Sur place
EUR 60 000 - 90 000
Nuclear Forensics Expert - Safeguards
Nuclear Forensics Expert - Safeguards

Mercor • Paris

Sur place
EUR 60 000 - 90 000
Nuclear Safeguards Expert - Red Team
Nuclear Safeguards Expert - Red Team

Mercor • Paris

Sur place
EUR 60 000 - 90 000
Nuclear Safeguards Expert - Red Team
Nuclear Safeguards Expert - Red Team

Obsidian • Paris

Sur place
EUR 65 000 - 90 000
Radiation Safety Red-Team Analyst
Radiation Safety Red-Team Analyst

Mercor • Paris

À distance
EUR 55 000 - 70 000
Radiological Safety Red-Teaming Lead
Radiological Safety Red-Teaming Lead

Mercor • Paris

Sur place
EUR 60 000 - 90 000