N’envoyez pas un CV générique — générez un CV et une lettre de motivation adaptés à ce poste précis.
Inria is seeking a PhD candidate to join the KerData team in Rennes. The project focuses on computational storage and its applications to scientific computing and AI, with collaborations across European partners.
You will pursue three objectives: survey ontologies, build empirical testbeds, and model performance for large-scale deployments. The position offers modern research facilities and close mentoring by senior researchers, with opportunities to publish in top venues and contribute to open
Fonction : Doctorant
The Inria center at the University of Rennes is one of eight Inria centers and has more than thirty research teams. The Inria center is a major and recognized player in the field of digital sciences. It is at the heart of a rich ecosystem of R&D and innovation, including highly innovative SMEs, large industrial groups, competitiveness clusters, research and higher education institutions, centers of excellence, and technological research institutes.
The thesis will be hosted by the KerData team at the Inria research center of Rennes. Rennes is the capital city of Britanny, in the western part of France. It is easy to reach thanks to the high-speed train line to Paris. Rennes is a dynamic, lively city and a major center for higher education and research: 25% of its population are students.
This thesis will include collaborations with international partners from Germany, thus research visits to and from the collaborator's teams are expected.
Computational storage [15, 16] is a promising technology to improve the efficiency and performance of various workloads, for example in scientific computing, machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI). As the volume of generated data continues to grow exponentially [5,9] conventional compute and storage architectures are increasingly constrained by large data movements between storage/memory and compute resources. Computational storage can eliminate many of these data movements by co-locating compute capabilities along with storage locations allowing to offload the typically much smaller (sub)programs [1, 12, 14]. While the concept is well established in literature, computational storage devices are not widely commercially available or deployed in data centers today. A key challenge is that computational storage encourages domain-specialization for highest efficiency while economic factors encourage commoditization of products catering to broad markets. A second challenge is that both for legacy applications as well as emerging applications such as ML/AI it remains an open research question how to program and orchestrate across distributed platforms with computational storage capabilities.
Recent advancements in programming models and software portability on the one hand, and reconfigurable hardware and domain-specific hardware design on the other [5, 7, 11], suggest that a modular approach that identifies common building blocks across domain boundaries might hold the key to both aforementioned challenges. Computational storage research exists on accelerating specific workloads or applications [5, 11, 14] as well as on emulating computational storage devices but a systematic study focusing on scientific computing workloads and modelling of suitable architectures and data distribution strategies is missing.
This project aims to advance the research on computational storage for scientific computing and artificial intelligence applications. It will investigate mechanisms to formalize, capture, model and evaluate computational storage in distributed environments. The project is structured into three primary objectives:
To explore how computational storage can aid workloads in scientific computing and artificial intelligence, we will build upon previous work and active research of the members of the supervisory team in Germany and France.
For objective A, the research methodology centers on analysing real-world scientific computing use cases in close exchange with domain scientists to identify computational storage opportunities. This work will establish ontologies and taxonomies for distributed computational storage systems from multiple angles across multiple domains. This work will be complementary to collaborations with the German Climate Computing Center (DKRZ) and the Parallel Computing and I/O group at Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg. Several surveys have taken snapshots of the state of the art of computational storage [12, 14] and its precursors or related concepts (e.g., active storage, near-data processing, processing in memory). The outcome of this aim will be a state of the art survey focusing on the applicability for scientific computing in the HPC, to cloud and edge computing continuum.
Objective B is to establish suitable testbeds and modeling environments to study computational storage at scale. The work will build upon existing research of the KerData team to leverage system simulation to model large scale distributed systems [13] in addition to empirical platforms leveraging hardware emulation [7, 10], as well as realistic software stacks and physical hardware within Grid5000, Slices-FR or Chameleon Cloud and domain-specific experimental platforms together with collaborators from the different domain sciences. The targeted outcome of Objective B are proof-of-concept environments to run real-world computational workflows leveraging real operating system, middleware and device APIs.
Objective C is to develop a methodology to faithfully model performance extrapolation to large-scale deployment scenarios will evaluate and validate the impact achievable through common computational storage building blocks. The methodology aims to study, for example, task and data placement strategies based on the needs of real-world computational science use cases but extrapolated to system scales not deployed in state of the art data centers today. The outcome will be a methodological framework to support middleware and domain-specific computational storage device development.
[1] Antonio Barbalace and Jaeyoung Do. 2021. Computational Storage: Where Are We Today? (2021). Retrieved from https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/computational-storage-where-are-we-today
[2] H. Casanova. 2001. Simgrid: a toolkit for the simulation of application scheduling. In Proceedings First IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, May 2001. 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2001.923223
[3] Henri Casanova, Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Ryan Tanaka, Suraj Pandey, Gautam Jethwani, William Koch, Spencer Albrecht, James Oeth, and Frédéric Suter. 2020. Developing accurate and scalable simulators of production workflow management systems with WRENCH. Future Generation Computer Systems 112, (November 2020), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.05.030
[4] Henri Casanova, Arnaud Giersch, Arnaud Legrand, Martin Quinson, and Frédéric Suter. 2014. Versatile, Scalable, and Accurate Simulation of Distributed Applications and Platforms. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 74, 10 (June 2014), 2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.06.008
[5] Mehdi Hassanpour, Marc Riera, and Antonio González. 2021. A Survey of Near-Data Processing Architectures for Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.12630
[6] Niclas Hedam, Morten Tychsen Clausen, Philippe Bonnet, Sangjin Lee, and Ken Friis Larsen. 2023. Delilah: eBPF-offload on Computational Storage. In Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware (DaMoN ’23), June 18, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592980.3595319
[7] Sang-Hoon Kim, Jaehoon Shim, Euidong Lee, Seongyeop Jeong, Ilkueon Kang, and Jin-Soo Kim. 2023. NVMeVirt: A Versatile Software-defined Virtual NVMe Device. 2023. 379–394. Retrieved September 22, 2025 from https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/kim-sang-hoon
[8] Jaewook Kwak, Sangjin Lee, Kibin Park, Jinwoo Jeong, and Yong Ho Song. 2020. Cosmos+ OpenSSD: Rapid Prototype for Flash Storage Systems. ACM Trans. Storage 16, 3 (August 2020), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385073
[9] Joo Hwan Lee, Hui Zhang, Veronica Lagrange, Praveen Krishnamoorthy, Xiaodong Zhao, and Yang Seok Ki. 2020. SmartSSD: FPGA Accelerated Near-Storage Data Analytics on SSD. IEEE Computer Architecture Letters 19, 2 (July 2020), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCA.2020.3009347
[10] Huaicheng Li, Mingzhe Hao, Michael Hao Tong, Swaminatahan Sundararaman, and Haryadi S Gunawi. The CASE of FEMU: Cheap, Accurate, Scalable and Extensible Flash Emulator.
[11] Leibo Liu, Jianfeng Zhu, Zhaoshi Li, Yanan Lu, Yangdong Deng, Jie Han, Shouyi Yin, and Shaojun Wei. 2019. A Survey of Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Architecture and Design: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 52, 6 (October 2019), 118:1-118:39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357375
[12] Corne Lukken and Animesh Trivedi. 2021. Past, Present and Future of Computational Storage: A Survey. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.09691
[13] Julien Monniot, François Tessier, Henri Casanova, and Gabriel Antoniu. 2024. Simulation of Large-Scale HPC Storage Systems: Challenges and Methodologies. December 18, 2024. 1. Retrieved January 4, 2025 from https://inria.hal.science/hal-04784808
[14] Siqi Zhang, Na Yi, and Yi Ma. 2024. A Survey of Computation Offloading with Task Types. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.01017
[15] 2025. NVM Express Computational Programs Command Set Specification, Revision 1.1.
[16] 2026. SNIA Computational Storage Architecture and Programming Model 1.2. Retrieved June 30, 2026 from https://www.snia.org/sites/default/files/technical-work/computational/release/SNIA-Computational-Storage-Architecture-and-Programming-Model-1.2.pdf
Required Competence:
Appreciated: