Una candidatura completa in un minuto
Curriculum e lettera di presentazione personalizzati, pronti da inviare.
SandboxAQ is seeking a Staff Materials Research Scientist in the PFAS Alternative Discovery area within the ChemSim group. You will serve as the scientific bridge between our generative chemistry discovery workflow and external partners validating candidate molecules for semiconductor applications, ensuring outputs meet process and safety constraints.
You will own the partner validation loop, run the discovery workflow, rank compounds for experimental validation, and translate feedback into
Staff Materials Research Scientist, PFAS Alternative Discovery at SandboxAQ, United States (remote). A lead-level full time position in the ChemSim team, listed under research.
Introduction to the team: The PFAS team sits within SandboxAQ's Chemical Simulation (ChemSim) group. Our mission is to develop PFAS-lean or PFAS-free substitutes and formulations for semiconductor process and fab materials that meet both performance specifications and environmental and safety requirements in complex semiconductor manufacturing environments. We combine generative ML, physics-based simulation (e.g. DFT and molecular dynamics), Large Quantitative Models for property prediction, and multi-scale modeling with a partner-driven experimental validation loop — working alongside industrial co-development partners to move candidate molecules from prediction to qualified use. Introduction to the role: The PFAS team is looking for a Staff Materials Research Scientist to serve as the scientific bridge between our generative chemistry discovery workflow and the external partners who validate our candidate molecules. This role is central to our efforts to ensure that the compounds our AI-driven workflow proposes are directionally correct, appropriate for the target semiconductor use case, and grounded in real manufacturing constraints. This person will: (1) own the partner-facing validation loop — serving as the primary point of contact with our co-development partners on problem definition, target specifications, constraints, and qualification criteria; (2) run our generative chemistry workflow, assess the predicted compounds, and rank them by fitness for the use case to deliver decision-ready shortlists for partner validation; (3) translate experimental feedback from partners into concrete technical improvement points that the rest of the team members can act on; and (4) bring semiconductor domain judgment to bear on the whole pipeline, deciding whether workflow outputs are qualitatively and directionally accurate and validating lead molecules against process reality.