Remote VA Eligibility QA Specialist – AI & Policy

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; On-site; USD 34,000 - 55,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking a remote VA Eligibility Specialist to review AI outputs across VA eligibility operations workflows.

You will assess workflow correctness, policy adherence, and stakeholder fit, and document the right next steps so the modeling team can train on them. In this contractor role you will grade tone, escalation logic, and alignment with firm guidance on a structured rubric; flag gaps, and maintain reviewer-quality scores in calibration cycles.

Qualifications

• Direct working experience in va eligibility specialist operations on real teams for VA Eligibility Specialist work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the policy or workflow being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current va eligibility specialist operations workflows, playbooks, and firm policy for VA Eligibility Specialist assignments.
• Grade tone, escalation logic, and stakeholder fit on a structured rubric.
• Flag operational risk, missed escalations, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags.
• Capture the right next step so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed treatments against published playbooks or firm guidance.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in inter-rater calibration cycles.

Skills

Operational review

Policy adherence

Workflow judgment

Stakeholder communication

VA Eligibility specialist operations

Job description

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking a remote VA Eligibility Specialist to review AI outputs across VA eligibility operations workflows.

You will assess workflow correctness, policy adherence, and stakeholder fit, and document the right next steps so the modeling team can train on them. In this contractor role you will grade tone, escalation logic, and alignment with firm guidance on a structured rubric; flag gaps, and maintain reviewer-quality scores in calibration cycles.