Remote Cocos2d-x Code Review Engineer

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 165,000 - 193,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking a remote Cocos2d-x Game Developer reviewer to evaluate production code, debugging traces, and AI outputs for real-world correctness. You will reproduce failures, write tests the model should have written, and explain fixes to guide the modeling team.

Responsibilities include running code in sandboxed environments, grading solutions for correctness and style, and documenting a rationale for ranking paired solutions.

Qualifications

• Strong day-to-day engineering experience reading, running, and debugging unfamiliar code.
• Ability to write concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec or similar).
• Clear written reasoning to convince a senior engineer from your review notes.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Cocos2d-x Game Developer assignments.
• Grade game development solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Tag failure modes (compile error, runtime crash, off-by-one, security issue) with severity scores.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

Game development

Security review awareness

Job description

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking a remote Cocos2d-x Game Developer reviewer to evaluate production code, debugging traces, and AI outputs for real-world correctness. You will reproduce failures, write tests the model should have written, and explain fixes to guide the modeling team.

Responsibilities include running code in sandboxed environments, grading solutions for correctness and style, and documenting a rationale for ranking paired solutions.