Remote Clinical Review Specialist for AI Guidelines

AuraOne Human Data; United States; Remote; USD 124,000 - 207,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking a Clinical / Health Domain Expert for a remote clinical-review track that evaluates AI outputs touching clinical review.

Reviewers grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence, flag patient-safety issues, and document corrected reasoning for model improvement. Responsibilities include reviewing AI outputs against current guidelines, applying structured rubrics, flagging safety issues with severity tags, and capturing corrected reasoning for

Qualifications

• Active or recent license / board certification in clinical review or an adjacent specialty for Clinical / Health Domain Expert work.
• Hands-on clinical experience reading patient cases and writing structured assessments.
• Clear written reasoning that cites guidelines, evidence, or standard of care.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current clinical review clinical guidelines and standard of care for Clinical / Health Domain Expert assignments.
• Grade differential reasoning, dosing, and red-flag handling on a structured rubric.
• Flag patient-safety issues with severity tags that match clinical-incident taxonomies.
• Capture the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed cases against published evidence or specialty guidelines.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in weekly inter-rater calibration cycles.

Skills

Clinical reasoning

Guideline review

Patient-safety assessment

Structured clinical writing

Clinical review

Job description

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking a Clinical / Health Domain Expert for a remote clinical-review track that evaluates AI outputs touching clinical review.

Reviewers grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence, flag patient-safety issues, and document corrected reasoning for model improvement. Responsibilities include reviewing AI outputs against current guidelines, applying structured rubrics, flagging safety issues with severity tags, and capturing corrected reasoning for