Program management / implementation planning Evaluator

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 117,000 - 165,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking a remote Program management / implementation planning Evaluator to review prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. You will compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write structured feedback for retraining the modeling team.

As a contractor, you’ll evaluate model outputs, tag issues, and tag severity while maintaining consistent rubric application. Expect remote collaboration and flexible hours.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on program management / implementation planning evaluation or adjacent content.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate program management / implementation planning evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Skills

Model evaluation

Rubric annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Program evaluation

Job description

Program management / implementation planning Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing program management / implementation planning evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Category: Frontier Model Evaluation · Pay: $80–$120 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Program management / implementation planning Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing program management / implementation planning evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric.

About the role

Program management / implementation planning Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing program management / implementation planning evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.
AI data reviewers help turn program management / implementation planning evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.
Review frontier model outputs. Judge benchmark failures and calibrate other evaluators.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate program management / implementation planning evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Program management / implementation planning Evaluator assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Role details

Track Evaluation & annotation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $80–$120 / hr Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on program management / implementation planning evaluation or adjacent content for Program management / implementation planning Evaluator work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Compare two program management / implementation planning evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Useful experience

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Compensation and schedule

$80–$120 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Program management / implementation planning evaluation