Patient Access Leader

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 83,000 - 138,000; Part time

Job summary

AuraOne is seeking a Patient Access Leader for a remote clinical-review track evaluating AI outputs related to clinical review. Reviewers assess differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence, flag patient-safety issues, and document corrected clinical reasoning for model improvement.

The role is remote, contractor-based, paying $80 per hour with flexible scheduling and program-defined task volume.

Qualifications

• Active or recent clinical license or board cert in clinical review or related field.
• Experience reading patient cases and writing structured assessments.
• Ability to apply multi-page rubrics consistently to large batches.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against clinical guidelines and standard of care for Patient Access Leader assignments.
• Grade differential reasoning, dosing, and red-flag handling on a structured rubric.
• Flag patient-safety issues with severity tags that match clinical-incident taxonomies.
• Capture the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed cases against published evidence or specialty guidelines.

Skills

Clinical reasoning

Guideline review

Patient-safety assessment

Structured clinical writing

Clinical review

Education

Medical license or board certification in clinical review

Job description

Patient Access Leader is a remote clinical-review track for evaluating AI outputs that touch clinical review. Reviewers grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence; flag patient-safety issues; and document the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can close the gap.

Category: Medical & Clinical AI · Pay: $80 / hr · Location: Remote - US-eligible · Contractor

Patient Access Leader is a remote clinical-review track for evaluating AI outputs that touch clinical review.

Role details

Track Healthcare review

About the role

Patient Access Leader is a remote clinical-review track for evaluating AI outputs that touch clinical review. Reviewers grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence; flag patient-safety issues; and document the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can close the gap.
Clinical review AI is only useful if a credentialed clinician would sign their name to the output. AuraOne uses licensed and credentialed reviewers to set the bar for clinical reasoning, dosing, and guideline adherence in regulated workflows.
Review clinical and biomedical AI outputs. Your safety judgment is the point.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current clinical review clinical guidelines and standard of care for Patient Access Leader assignments.
• Grade differential reasoning, dosing, and red-flag handling on a structured rubric.
• Flag patient-safety issues with severity tags that match clinical-incident taxonomies.
• Capture the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed cases against published evidence or specialty guidelines.

What you should bring

• Active or recent license / board certification in clinical review or an adjacent specialty for Patient Access Leader work.
• Hands-on clinical experience reading patient cases and writing structured assessments.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites guidelines, evidence, or standard of care.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Grade a model's differential-diagnosis reasoning on a clinical review case and write a 2-3 sentence assessment.
• Flag a dosing miscalculation with the right severity tag and corrected dose.
• Adjudicate a disputed case between two reviewers using current specialty guidelines.
• Audit a 25-case batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Useful experience

• Prior work as a guideline reviewer, peer reviewer, or clinical educator.
• Familiarity with AI-assisted clinical decision support and its failure modes.
• Bilingual clinical experience for non-English patient cases.

Compensation and schedule

$80 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Clinical reasoning
• Guideline review
• Patient-safety assessment
• Structured clinical writing
• Clinical review