Una candidatura completa en un minuto
Currículum y carta de presentación personalizados, listos para enviar.
BetterFutureLabs is seeking a sharp, analytical person to tune our AI-driven expert-finding system. You will review candidate profiles, provide feedback, and recommend who to hire for programs with Fortune 500 teams. The role blends interviewing, judging teaching samples, and coordinating with clients to ensure top-fit experts.
Flexible, remote work in the United States, about 5-20 hours per week to start. Training practice is built around Experts who teach hands-on with AI and work as part-time
AI is changing fast, and companies need their employees to keep up. Many turn to universities for training. Universities do great work, but their instructors are often theorists rather than people who use these tools on the job every day.
BetterFutureLabs built a training practice to solve that. Our programs are taught by Experts: people who work hands-on with AI every day and know how to teach it. They're part-time contractors we bring in program by program. We run some programs directly with companies, including Fortune 500 teams, and some with university partners.
Finding the right Experts is a challenging part of every program, so we built an AI system to help. It searches our own network and online communities for signs that someone is a strong operator with real teaching experience.
We're looking for a sharp, analytical person to work with that system: tune it for each program, vet the Experts it finds, and help us hire the best fit.
A typical program looks like this:
1
We win a program. You ingest everything we know about what the client needs: their documents, their goals and, later, the final course outline.
2
Our system suggests who to look for. It proposes 5-10 types of Experts who could teach the program. You review the suggested profiles and give feedback until they're right.
3
Our system finds candidates. It searches our network and online communities for strong operators who teach. You flag anyone who doesn't fit.
4
5
You interview and recommend. You talk with the candidates who respond and appear to be a good fit, review their teaching samples, and recommend who we should hire.
Our system handles most of the searching, so your time goes to the parts that need a person: shaping the profiles, talking with candidates and judging who can teach. If you source someone outside the system, that's great too.
We've used this process to successfully staff a few programs already and the results have been very positive.
Some trainings we provide are technical, some are business, most revolve around AI. Either way, the question is whether the potential expert can communicate clearly and compellingly. You'll judge:
Teaching quality. Do they know the material, and can they explain it well?
Communication style. Are they clear, engaging and easy to follow?
Professionalism. Are they ready to stand in front of a Fortune 500 team?
You should be comfortable with technology, though you don't need to be a developer. If an Expert can make a hard topic clear to you, that's a good sign. We can use other tools to assess their technical knowledge.
You'll staff a full program on time, from course outline to signed contracts. A program usually requires 1-5 Experts with different areas of expertise and skills
The Experts you recommend get strong reviews from the client
The system finds better candidates because of your feedback
Right now the role is flexible and on demand. We're building the business, so the work comes in bursts: about 5-20 hours a week, and a busy week can be followed by a quiet couple of weeks.
As we add programs, expect more hours and a steadier, more predictable schedule.