Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert)

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 69,000 - 165,000; Part time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking an independent specialist contractor to review and evaluate candidate code outputs for Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) tasks. You will run, reproduce, and assess solutions in a sandbox, focusing on correctness and edge cases.

The role is remote (US-eligible) with pay between $50 and $120 per hour; placement depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job engineering experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go test, RSpec).
• Clear written reasoning — your review note must convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) assignments.
• Grade electronic engineer engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering judgment

Qucs-S

Tools

pytest

Jest

JUnit

Go test

RSpec

Job description

About the role

Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Category: Coding, SWE & Agent Evaluation · Pay: $50–$120 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) assignments.
• Grade electronic engineer engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.

Role details

Track Code review & evaluation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $50–$120 / hr Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Strong day-job engineering experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Electronic Engineer (Qucs-S expert) work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework. pytest, Jest, or JUnit. Go test, RSpec, or whatever you use.
• Clear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Reproduce a generated engineering solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.
• Write the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge‑case bug.
• Compare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Triage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.

Useful experience

• Open-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.
• Experience with the target language's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.
• Familiarity with security‑review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.

Compensation and schedule

$50–$120 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Code review
• Debugging
• Unit testing
• Software engineering judgment
• Electronic Engineer engineering review
• Qucs‑S

Application boundary

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

Specialist intake

The intake preserves your chosen role, the visible terms, and source attribution for reviewer context.
- 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.
- 02 Attach this role deliberately.
- 03 Receive a human review decision or follow-up.
Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.