Computational Physics Expert

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 136,000 - 194,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs is seeking a Computational Physics Expert to remotely review AI outputs in physics reasoning, calculations, and research workflows. Reviewers assess derivations, reproduce results, and document methods to train the modeling team.

Responsibilities include critiquing methods, flagging errors with severity tags, and producing worked examples for training. This is a contractor role with hourly compensation and US eligibility.

Qualifications

• Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in physics or a closely related field.
• Experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Comfort applying rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning citing methods, papers, or worked examples.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current physics methods, conventions, and prior work.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or experimental claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture the corrected reasoning or worked example so the modeling team can train on it.

Skills

Scientific reasoning

Quantitative analysis

Citations review

Clear written communication

Async availability

Education

PhD / postdoc / industry research experience

Job description

Computational Physics Expert is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across physics reasoning, calculations, and research workflows. Reviewers grade derivations and assumptions, reproduce key results, and document the correct method so the modeling team can train on it.

Category: Scientific AI & Domain Experts · Pay: $120 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

About the role

Computational Physics Expert is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across physics reasoning, calculations, and research workflows. Reviewers grade derivations and assumptions, reproduce key results, and document the correct method so the modeling team can train on it.
Physics models live or die on whether their derivations actually hold up under scrutiny. AuraOne uses scientific specialists to grade outputs the way a peer reviewer would — checking assumptions, reproducing key steps, and capturing the right method alongside the wrong one.
Bring scientific and technical domain expertise into AI reasoning, research, and dataset review.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current physics methods, conventions, and prior work for Computational Physics Expert assignments.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or experimental claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture the corrected reasoning or worked example so the modeling team can train on it.Track STEM research review Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process. Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in physics or a closely related field for Computational Physics Expert work.
• Hands‑on experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Comfort applying multi‑page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites methods, papers, or worked examples.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Reproduce a physics derivation from a model output and flag any algebraic or dimensional errors.
• Grade a model's literature summary against the cited papers and rate the citation quality.
• Adjudicate a disputed answer between two reviewers using textbook methods.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Useful experience

• PhD, postdoc, or industry research experience in the topic area.
• Prior work reviewing AI‑assisted research tooling and its failure modes.
• Multilingual fluency for non‑English papers and corpora.

Compensation and schedule

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program‑defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Scientific reasoning
• Method validation
• Citation review
• Quantitative analysis
• Physics