Get a reply from this employer
Your resume and cover letter, tailored to exactly what they’re hiring for.
Turing is seeking experienced Clinical & Health SMEs to author, evaluate, and calibrate high-fidelity clinical tasks, long-chart scenarios, and evaluation rubrics.
Contributors will join across multiple disciplines and be placed in Expert Contributor or Senior Specialist tracks; engagement is contractor with 4 hours/day minimum and up to 40 hours/week.
Author and evaluate clinical tasks and scenarios for healthcare training.
About Turing
Turing is one of the world’s fastest-growing AI companies, accelerating the advancement and deployment of powerful AI systems.
Turing helps customers in two ways: Working with the world’s leading AI labs to advance frontier model capabilities in thinking, reasoning, coding, agentic behavior, multimodality, multilinguality, STEM, and frontier knowledge; and leveraging that work to build real-world AI systems that solve mission-critical priorities for companies.
Role Overview
We are seeking experienced Clinical & Health Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to author, evaluate, and calibrate high-fidelity clinical tasks, long-chart scenarios, workplace simulations, and benchmark evaluation rubrics.
This unified opening covers contributors across multiple clinical, behavioral-health, revenue-cycle, quality, pharmacy, rehabilitation, and healthcare-operations disciplines. Candidates will be placed in either an Expert Contributor or Senior Specialist / Functional Lead track based on clinical depth, years of experience, active licensure or certification, leadership experience, and prior review or calibration expertise.
Depending on the assigned discipline, relevant qualifications may include:
Clinical Benchmark Authoring & Task Design: Develop high-difficulty clinical tasks, long-chart scenarios, realistic workplace cases, gold-standard answers, and evaluation criteria within the assigned discipline.
Longitudinal Chart Synthesis: Evaluate fragmented, multi-encounter records and identify clinically meaningful trends, contradictions, omissions, risks, and required actions.
Clinical Accuracy & Safety Review: Assess whether outputs are clinically accurate, practical, evidence-aligned, patient-safe, and appropriate for the relevant care setting.
Rubric Application & Scoring: Apply evaluation criteria defined by the Functional SME Lead to assess outputs for clinical reasoning, terminology, documentation quality, regulatory alignment, payer accuracy, and patient-safety implications.
Specialty Task Evaluation: Depending on the assigned area, review tasks involving mobility and discharge planning, swallow and diet-texture recommendations, medical necessity, prior authorization, claims and denials, nutrition support, diabetes management, psychosocial safety, infection prevention, coding and CDI, medication safety, addiction treatment, emergency decision-making, or EMS handoffs.
Peer Review & Calibration — Senior Track: Review and calibrate pod members’ work, resolve edge-case ambiguities, identify rubric inconsistencies, and maintain day-to-day quality standards.
Cross-Functional Review: Evaluate tasks that require coordination across physicians, nurses, therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dietitians, coders, case managers, payers, laboratory professionals, or emergency personnel.
Iterative Refinement: Incorporate calibration feedback, revise task content and solutions, and participate in multiple critique cycles to align deliverables with project standards.
Escalation & Quality Ownership — Senior Track: Escalate genuine clinical, regulatory, or rubric ambiguities to the Functional SME Lead and support consistent decision-making across the pod.
Senior contributors may be responsible for:
Skills: Emergency Medicine, General Medicine, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Pathology, Psychiatry