BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A)

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 55,000 - 83,000; Part time

Job summary

AuraOne is seeking qualified lawyers to remotely review AI outputs in litigation workflows. You will assess citations, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence, flag risk, and document corrected analysis for model training.

This contractor role offers an hourly rate of $50, with US-eligible remote work and flexible weekly hours; prior litigation experience and ability to apply rubrics across long batches are required.

Qualifications

• Active or recent qualification in litigation or an adjacent practice.
• Experience drafting, reviewing, or advising on real matters.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning citing authority and the rule being applied.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current litigation statutes, case law, or policy for BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) assignments.
• Verify citations, jurisdictions, and dates against authoritative sources.
• Flag risky reasoning, missed exceptions, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags.
• Capture the corrected analysis or memo paragraph so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed treatments against published authority or firm policy.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Skills

Legal research

Citation review

Statutory analysis

Policy reasoning

Litigation

Education

Bar admission or equivalent credential

Job description

BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in litigation workflows. Reviewers grade citation accuracy, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence; flag risk; and document the corrected analysis so the modeling team can train on it.

Category: Legal & Policy AI Evaluation · Pay: $50 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in litigation workflows.

About the role

BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in litigation workflows. Reviewers grade citation accuracy, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence; flag risk; and document the corrected analysis so the modeling team can train on it.
Litigation content is judged on precision. AuraOne uses qualified legal and policy reviewers to grade AI outputs the way a senior associate would — with citations, severity tags, and the corrected reasoning alongside the original.
Judge legal, policy, and compliance outputs for precision and risk.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current litigation statutes, case law, or policy for BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) assignments.
• Verify citations, jurisdictions, and dates against authoritative sources.
• Flag risky reasoning, missed exceptions, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags.
• Capture the corrected analysis or memo paragraph so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed treatments against published authority or firm policy.

Role details

Track Legal & policy review Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process. Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Active or recent qualification in litigation or an adjacent practice for BigLaw lawyers (Litigation/Corporate/M&A) work.
• Hands-on experience drafting, reviewing, or advising on real matters.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites authority and names the rule being applied.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Verify the citations in a model's litigation memo and flag any miscites with severity.
• Grade a model's statutory reasoning on a complex fact pattern and rate the analysis.
• Adjudicate a disputed treatment between two reviewers using current authority.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Useful experience

• Bar admission or legal-equivalent credential in a relevant jurisdiction.
• Prior experience reviewing AI-assisted legal-research or compliance tooling.
• Bilingual experience for cross-jurisdiction matters.

Compensation and schedule

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Legal research
• Citation review
• Statutory analysis
• Policy reasoning
• Litigation

Application boundary

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

Specialist intake

The intake preserves your chosen role, the visible terms, and source attribution for reviewer context.
- 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.
- 02 Attach this role deliberately.
- 03 Receive a human review decision or follow-up.
Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.