AI Technical Writer & Evaluator

micro1; Northern (KY); Hybrid; USD 34,440,000 - 82,656,000; Part time

Job summary

micro1 is engaging Technical Writers/Editors for a contractor role on a customer project centered on advanced AI system development. You will apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems, shaping how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input.

In this role, you will participate in a Write-like-Human Eval, compare model responses to prompts, and provide analytical quality scores with detailed rationales, while meeting deadlines in a virtual

Qualifications

• Native-level English fluency and exceptional written communication skills.
• Demonstrated experience in technical writing, editing, or content evaluation.
• Strong ability to judge clarity, tone, coherence, and usefulness in technical and instructional content.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate and compare AI-generated responses to writing prompts focusing on clarity, tone, helpfulness, and adherence to instructions.
• Provide comprehensive rationales and scoring with clear, concise feedback.
• Identify opportunities to enhance the quality and instructional value of language model outputs.
• Apply expert judgment to assess subtle differences in writing quality and effectiveness.
• Maintain meticulous attention to detail when reviewing content and documenting findings.
• Collaborate asynchronously with project managers and reviewers to ensure consistency and completeness of deliverables.
• Contribute to the project by leveraging advanced command of written English and critical analysis skills.

Skills

English fluency

Technical writing

Editing

Content evaluation

Job description

micro1 is engaging Technical Writers/Editors for a contractor role on a customer project centered on advanced AI system development. You will apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems, shaping how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input.

In this role, you will participate in a Write-like-Human Eval, compare model responses to prompts, and provide analytical quality scores with detailed rationales, while meeting deadlines in a virtual