AI-Driven UX Design Review Specialist — Remote

AuraOne; United States; On-site; USD 55,000 - 96,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne seeks a Circuit Design Expert to remotely review AI-generated UI/UX outputs. You will assess craft, constraints, and tooling, then document corrected approaches for model training. This contractor role requires clear written reasoning and consistent rubric application across long batches.

Responsibilities include grading against briefs, flagging format or naming issues, adjudicating differing judgments per style guides, and maintaining calibration scores.

Qualifications

• Portfolio or production experience in ui / ux design or an adjacent creative discipline for Circuit Design Expert work.
• Hands-on familiarity with the standard tooling for the discipline.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the craft issue and the standard being applied.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current ui / ux design craft and tooling standards for Circuit Design Expert assignments.
• Grade composition, constraint adherence, and production-readiness on a structured rubric.
• Flag tooling-specific failures (file format, scale, naming, layer hygiene) with severity tags.
• Capture the corrected approach or reference so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed creative judgments against published references or firm style guides.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in inter-rater calibration cycles.

Skills

Creative review

Production-grade craft

Tooling fluency

Asset evaluation

UI / UX design

Design

Job description

AuraOne seeks a Circuit Design Expert to remotely review AI-generated UI/UX outputs. You will assess craft, constraints, and tooling, then document corrected approaches for model training. This contractor role requires clear written reasoning and consistent rubric application across long batches.

Responsibilities include grading against briefs, flagging format or naming issues, adjudicating differing judgments per style guides, and maintaining calibration scores.