QA Automation Engineer
Build and own the automation framework and the regression suite that decides whether a release reaches production. You are the person who can stop a deployment, and that authority is real.
Location
Greater Noida
Type
Full-time, permanent
Reports to
Head of Engineering
Experience
4+ years
Why this role
- Test a system you are not allowed to read the data in.
- Release-gating authority that is genuinely enforced
- In the design conversation, not handed finished features
- Adversarial testing of an append-only, tamper-evident ledger
- Failures here are logical rather than visual
What you'll actually do
- The framework: API and UI automation, built as a codebase with the same standards as the product
- The regression suite — fast enough that people run it, trustworthy enough that a red build means something
- Release gating: pre-production validation and the criteria for going to production, defined and enforced
- Contract and integration tests across services and across the boundary with connected organisations
- Quality signal: defect triage, coverage and escape metrics that leadership can act on rather than admire
The hard part
- Testing blind — your test data strategy, fixtures and failure diagnosis all have to work without looking at the payload
- Proving a negative: testing that the ledger works is easy; testing that it cannot be quietly subverted is the actual job
- Withdrawal propagation — verifying that guarantee across a distributed system, including the failure paths
- Consequence: a defect here is not a bad release, it is a reportable event with a regulator attached
Minimum qualification
- 4 years building test automation as software, or 3 years with an advanced degree — or equivalent practical experience
- You have designed an automation framework from scratch, not only written tests inside somebody else's
- Strong programming in Python, TypeScript or Java — an engineer who specialises in testing, not a tester who scripts
- Playwright, Cypress or Selenium at depth, and API testing with RestAssured, Postman/Newman or equivalent
- Tests wired into CI as a gate that can genuinely block a release
- Test design as a discipline: risk-based coverage, boundary and negative cases, and the judgement to say what is not worth automating
- Hands‑on use of AI‑assisted testing tools, and a clear view of where they help and where they lie
Preferred
- Contract testing between services — Pact or equivalent
- Performance and load testing with JMeter, k6 or Locust, and the ability to interpret the numbers
- Security testing fundamentals: OWASP Top 10, authentication and authorisation edge cases, injection paths
- Mobile test automation, ideally Flutter
- ISTQB certification
How we work
- Hybrid working style with anchor at our Grandthum office in Greater Noida, Tech Zone IV
- Defined core collaboration hours — outside that, flex your day around its natural shape
- Architecture decisions get written down and argued in the open. Small, reviewable changes. Depth is valued over volume
- Company‑issued devices and approved tooling for anything touching customer or compliance data. Given what we build, we hold ourselves to the standard we sell
The practical details
- Location: Grandthum, Tech Zone IV, Greater Noida West, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
- Employment type: full‑time, permanent
- Reports to: Head of Engineering
- Education: B.E./B.Tech or M.Tech in CS/IT, or equivalent demonstrated experience — we mean the second part
- Offers are subject to standard background verification, which we will explain before we ask for anything
How we interview you
- A 30‑minute conversation with our Head of Engineering
- A code and architecture discussion on something you have built and can talk about honestly
- A conversation with the founder about the company, the regulation and where this goes
- Four stages. We aim to complete them inside two weeks and to give you a decision either way
Ideal candidate
You’ll thrive here if this sounds like you
Consequence appeals to you rather than frightens you
You think adversarially about systems that claim to be tamper‑evident
You want to be in the design conversation, not downstream of it
You build test tooling to the same standard as production code
You are comfortable early: eighteen people, pre‑revenue, and a product that must be right before a regulator looks at it