Radiation Safety Officer - Compliance Expert

Mercor; Berlin; Vor Ort; EUR 70.000 - 90.000; Vollzeit

Zusammenfassung

Mercor is assembling a panel of radiological safety experts to red-team frontier AI models. You will write prompts across benign, dual-use and adversarial levels, evaluate model responses, and craft reference answers with clear rationales.

This work centers on distinguishing routine professional questions from sensitive misuse cases. You will contribute detailed reasoning and ensure clarity for non-specialists while operating within a safety-focused scope.

Qualifikationen

• License-holding RSOs with responsibility for acquisition, inventory, transfer and disposal.
• Ability to distinguish routine professional questions from advanced misuse scenarios.
• Experience in regulatory compliance and safety oversight in radiological contexts.

Aufgaben

• Write challenging single-turn prompts across benign, dual-use and adversarial levels.
• Evaluate model responses against a defined policy standard and judge handling accuracy.
• Write reference answers and the technical rationale explaining decisions.

Ausbildung

Named RSO on a broad-scope licence

RSO or deputy RSO at university/hospital/research institute

Industrial/irradiator RSO — Category 1 and 2 sources

Licensing/compliance specialist — regulator submissions

Radiation protection manager — ALARA/audits/training

Jobbeschreibung

About the work

Mercor is assembling a panel of radiological safety experts to red-team frontier AI models. The goal is to test whether a model can correctly judge the misuse potential of a technical request — answering legitimate questions fully while refusing genuinely dangerous ones.

You will:

• Write challenging single-turn prompts in your domain, labelled across three levels: benign, dual-use, and adversarial.
• Evaluate the responses that come back against a defined policy standard, and judge whether each was handled correctly.
• Write the reference answer — what a correct response looks like, and the technical reasoning for why.

This domain lives on the dual-use line more than most. The same isotope underpins cancer therapy and industrial radiography; the same shielding calculation protects a worker and conceals a source. A model that refuses a routine dose question is failing as badly as one that answers a question it shouldn't. Drawing that line reliably is why we need practitioners rather than generalists.

Background we're looking for

We're looking for people who have held the licence, not just worked under it — the person of record for acquisition, inventory, transfer and disposal. What matters most is being able to tell a routine professional question from one that's fishing for something else: the same shielding calculation protects a worker and conceals a source. You will be writing prompts that sit exactly on that line, then judging whether the model held it.

Examples of relevant backgrounds (ideally with red-teaming experience):

• Named RSO on a broad-scope licence — programme management, source inventory, regulatory compliance
• RSO or deputy RSO at a university, hospital or research institute running a mixed radionuclide and sealed‑source programme
• Industrial or irradiator RSO — Category 1 and 2 sealed sources, radiography, gauging, sterilisation
• Licensing and compliance specialist — NRC, Agreement State or national regulator submissions, amendments and inspections
• Radiation protection manager accountable for ALARA, audits, training and incident reporting across multiple authorised users

What this role demands beyond technical depth

This is writing-intensive work. Every judgment you make needs a written rationale that a non-specialist can follow. Prior technical writing, published research, or expert witness experience is a strong signal; please include a sample or link. You will also be reading and writing about misuse scenarios in your field for sustained periods. We brief experts on this in advance, and you can pause or step away at any point without penalty.

Before you apply

Your work here will not involve, and must not draw on, classified or export‑controlled information, or anything covered by an NDA or prepublication review obligation. If you hold such obligations you may still be a good fit; tell us in your application and we will scope the work accordingly.