Senior Python Engineer - AI Code Evaluation (Codex / Claude Code, up to $200/hr)

G2i Inc.; Miami (FL); On-site; USD 138,000 - 276,000; Part time

Job summary

Doist is seeking a Senior AI Interaction Evaluator to assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios. You will evaluate responses for usefulness, reasoning quality, and engineering judgment, without writing production code.

You will provide direct, opinionated feedback and help define what great looks like when interacting with AI tools like Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor. Start ASAP; duration through early May; 10–20 hours per week at $100–$200/hour.

Qualifications

• Staff/Principal-level engineer or equivalent experience.
• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript and Python.
• Hands-on with AI-assisted dev workflows and coding agents.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end.
• Judge usefulness, correctness, and engineering intuition.
• Assess explanations and reasoning quality, not just code.
• Provide clear, opinionated feedback on what works and what doesn’t.
• Help define what best-in-class interactions look like with AI tools.

Skills

TypeScript/JavaScript

Python

Engineering judgment

Tools

OpenAI Codex

Claude Code

Cursor

Job description

Senior AI Interaction Evaluator (Codex / Claude Code)Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week | Start ASAP (through early May)

Check out this Loom video for more details! We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.This is not a traditional engineering role.You won’t be writing production code.You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer

What This Role Actually Is

You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:

• Whether the response makes sense
• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer

This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.

What You’ll Be Doing

Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end Judge whether outputs are: Useful Correct (at a high level) Aligned with how a strong engineer would think Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4) Provide clear, opinionated feedback on: What worked What didn’t What felt “off” or misleading Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor

What We Mean by “Taste”

We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
• Would this interaction build or erode trust?

You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.

Who You Are

Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience) Strong background in one of the below: TypeScript / JavaScript Python Hands-on experience using: OpenAI Codex Claude Code Cursor Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback High bar for what “good engineering” looks like

• Nice to HaveExperience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs
• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

• Rate: $100–$200/hour
• Hours: ~10–20 hours/week
• Duration: Through early May (with possible extension)
• Start: ASAP

• Take-home evaluation exercise
• One behavioral interview