Stand out for this role — generate a tailored resume and cover letter in about a minute.
Omakase Robotics is seeking a senior ML/robotics researcher to train and deploy manipulation policies for humanoid robots. You will leverage teleoperation data from Japan to post-train VLA policies and will lead pre-training for a cross-embodiment manipulation foundation model.
You own data curation, training, evaluation, and real-robot deployment in a tightly integrated loop with hardware teams. You will design robust evaluation methods across real data, simulators, and field trials, and guide
*\ *Location: ** United States (SF Bay Area preferred; US-remote possible)
*\ *Employment: ** Full-time
We are building the *\ *Toyota of humanoid robots ** - humanoids that work reliably in the real world every day, built with mass-production discipline rather than demo discipline.
Three vertically integrated components:
*\ *Omakase D1 ** - our own humanoid hardware
*\ *Omakase Zen ** - the manipulation intelligence foundation (this role)
*\ *Omakase OS ** - the orchestration software that runs robots in the field
Our moat is data. Through our own fleet and a partnership with a leading spot-labor platform, we have structurally exclusive access to real-world teleoperation and egocentric human data at a scale competitors cannot replicate. Zen turns that flywheel into manipulation foundation models.
You will train the models that make our robots’ hands work.
Today that means post-training VLA policies (π0.5-class, ACT) on our own teleoperation data and deploying them onto real robots doing real jobs in Japan. Next it means pre-training a cross-embodiment manipulation foundation model on our proprietary dataset.
You own the loop end to end: data curation -> training -> evaluation -> real-robot deployment -> failure analysis -> back to data. We do not have a separate team that "puts the model on the robot." That handoff is where robot learning usually goes to die.
Concrete problems currently open on our side:
*\ *Action-space representation. ** Our end-effector-space policies are systematically weaker on rotation than on translation. Until the representation is fixed, EE-space deployment is blocked. This is an open problem we would want your opinion on in the interview.
*\ *Cross-embodiment transfer. ** We collect human hand trajectories and retarget them to the robot. How much of that transfers, and in which representation, is not yet settled by our own measurements.
*\ *Evaluation that predicts real-robot success. ** Open-loop MSE on held-out episodes is cheap and weakly correlated with what happens on the robot. We build sim-based harnesses and structured real-robot trials, and we would like them to disagree less.
*\ *Making failures legible. ** When a policy misses a grasp, the useful question is which part of the pipeline was wrong - the data, the representation, the training, or the hardware. We invest in being able to answer that.
Train and post-train VLA / imitation-learning policies (diffusion and flow-matching action heads, ACT, π-class models) on real teleoperation data
Design and run the pre-training effort for our cross-embodiment manipulation foundation model
Build rigorous evaluation: open-loop metrics on held-out real data, sim-based eval harnesses, structured real-robot trials
Own multi-node distributed training (we operate H100/H200 clusters) - throughput, dataloading, checkpointing
Work with the data team on dataset schemas, quality gates, and retargeting (EE-space cross-embodiment representations)
Deploy policies to real robots with the OS team and drive failure analysis back into data and training
We set a high bar here.
MS/PhD in ML, robotics, or CS - or an equivalent track record that speaks for itself
*\ *3+ years training large neural models, including at least one substantial robot-learning or VLA project you can walk us through in depth ** - what failed, what you measured, what you would do differently
Demonstrated experience with imitation learning / VLA architectures (π0-class, OpenVLA, RT-class, ACT, diffusion policies). Fine-tuning through an API does not qualify
Strong PyTorch or JAX; comfortable owning multi-GPU / multi-node training runs end to end
Experience evaluating policies beyond loss curves: held-out real-data metrics, real-robot success rates, ablations
Evidence of top-tier work: publications (CoRL / RSS / ICRA / NeurIPS / ICML) *\ *or ** policies you shipped onto physical robots in production or serious field trials
Cross-embodiment training or action-space retargeting (EE-space representations, IK-aware pipelines)
Teleoperation data collection systems; data-quality tooling for robot datasets
Sim-to-real and simulation-based evaluation (Isaac, MuJoCo, Genesis)
World models or video pre-training for robotics
Japanese is *\ *not ** required - Zen operates in English