Pronunciation Audio QA Reviewer

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 28,000 - 41,000; Full time

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. is seeking a remote Pronunciation Audio QA Reviewer to evaluate audio annotation prompts and responses against the company rubric. You will compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and provide structured feedback for retraining the models.

The role emphasizes clear written reasoning, attention to detail, and the ability to apply rubrics across long batches. Remote work from the United States is supported with contractor employment.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on audio annotation or adjacent content.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate audio annotation model outputs against the versioned rubric and assign severity tags.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Skills

Model output evaluation

Rubric-based annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Audio annotation

Speech evaluation

Voice QA

Audio review

Pronunciation

Job description

Pronunciation Audio QA Reviewer is a remote evaluation track for reviewing audio annotation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn audio annotation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.

Responsibilities

• Evaluate audio annotation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Pronunciation Audio QA Reviewer assignments.
• Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
• Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
• Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
• Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

Qualifications

• Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on audio annotation or adjacent content for Pronunciation Audio QA Reviewer work.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
• Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Compare two audio annotation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
• Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
• Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
• Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Nice to have

• Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
• Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
• Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Skills

• Model output evaluation
• Rubric-based annotation
• Severity tagging
• Inter-rater calibration
• Audio annotation
• Speech evaluation
• Voice QA
• Audio review
• Pronunciation

Work model

Remote — US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on audio annotation or adjacent content for Pronunciation Audio QA Reviewer work. Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches. Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied. Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem. Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.