Law Student

AuraOne, Inc.; United States; Remote; USD 28,000 - 34,000; Part time

Benefits offered by this job

Remote work

Job summary

AuraOne, Inc. seeks a Law Student for a remote review track evaluating AI outputs in legal review workflows. You will grade citations, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence, and document the corrected analysis for training the modeling team.

Verify citations, jurisdictions, and dates against authorities; flag risky reasoning and policy-adherence gaps; and adjudicate disputes. Flexible, asynchronous hours with remote US eligibility.

Qualifications

• Active or recent qualification in legal review or an adjacent practice for Law Student work.
• Hands-on experience drafting, reviewing, or advising on real matters.
• Ability to apply multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning citing authority and the applicable rule.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current legal review statutes, case law, or policy for Law Student assignments.
• Verify citations, jurisdictions, and dates against authoritative sources.
• Flag risky reasoning, missed exceptions, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags.
• Capture the corrected analysis or memo paragraph so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed treatments against published authority or firm policy.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in inter-rater calibration cycles.

Skills

Legal research

Citation review

Statutory analysis

Policy reasoning

Legal review

Legal

Education

Law degree in progress

Job description

Law Student is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs in legal review workflows. Reviewers grade citation accuracy, statutory reasoning, and policy adherence; flag risk; and document the corrected analysis so the modeling team can train on it.

Why this role matters

Legal review content is judged on precision. AuraOne uses qualified legal and policy reviewers to grade AI outputs the way a senior associate would — with citations, severity tags, and the corrected reasoning alongside the original.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current legal review statutes, case law, or policy for Law Student assignments.
• Verify citations, jurisdictions, and dates against authoritative sources.
• Flag risky reasoning, missed exceptions, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags.
• Capture the corrected analysis or memo paragraph so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed treatments against published authority or firm policy.
• Maintain reviewer-quality scores in inter-rater calibration cycles.

Qualifications

• Active or recent qualification in legal review or an adjacent practice for Law Student work.
• Hands-on experience drafting, reviewing, or advising on real matters.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites authority and names the rule being applied.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Verify the citations in a model's legal review memo and flag any miscites with severity.
• Grade a model's statutory reasoning on a complex fact pattern and rate the analysis.
• Adjudicate a disputed treatment between two reviewers using current authority.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Nice to have

• Bar admission or legal-equivalent credential in a relevant jurisdiction.
• Prior experience reviewing AI-assisted legal-research or compliance tooling.
• Bilingual experience for cross-jurisdiction matters.

Skills

• Legal research
• Citation review
• Statutory analysis
• Policy reasoning
• Legal review
• Legal

Work model

Remote - US-eligible. Remote - Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Compensation

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Active or recent qualification in legal review or an adjacent practice for Law Student work. Hands-on experience drafting, reviewing, or advising on real matters. Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches. Clear written reasoning that cites authority and names the rule being applied. Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.