Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 90,000 - 103,000; Full time

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs seeks an Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer for a remote engineering review track. You will evaluate production code, debug traces, and developer-facing AI outputs to ensure real-world correctness.

You will reproduce failures, write the unit tests the model should have written, and explain fixes so the modeling team can target the gap. This is a contractor role, remote with US eligibility, paying $65–$75 per hour.

Qualifications

• Strong day-job engineering experience with reading, running, and debugging unfamiliar code.
• Clear, concise unit-test writing demonstrating a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework such as pytest, Jest, or JUnit.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview grading experience is a plus.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment.
• Grade engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge cases.
• Write minimal failing tests demonstrating bugs.
• Compare paired solutions and rank with a written rationale.

Skills

Code review

Debugging

Unit testing

Software engineering

Engineering judgment

Tools

pytest

Jest

JUnit

Go test

RSpec

Job description

Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

Category: Coding, SWE & Agent Evaluation · Pay: $65–$75 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.

About the role

Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer is a remote engineering review track for evaluating production code, debugging traces, and developer-facing AI outputs against real-world correctness standards. Reviewers reproduce failures, write the unit test the model should have written, and explain the fix so the modeling team can target the gap.
Engineering model quality lives or dies on whether the generated code actually compiles, passes tests, and handles edge cases. AuraOne pairs experienced engineers with the modeling team to grade outputs the way a code reviewer would.
Judge generated code and software engineering agents. Read their debugging traces.

Responsibilities

• Run and reproduce candidate code outputs in a sandboxed environment for Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer assignments.
• Grade industrial hygienist / process safety engineer engineering review solutions for correctness, style, and edge-case handling.
• Write minimal failing tests that demonstrate the bug a model output missed.
• Compare paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.

Role details

Track Code review & evaluation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $65–$75 / hr Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Strong day-job engineering experience — you can read, run, and debug unfamiliar code for Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer work.
• Comfort writing concise unit tests that capture a single failure mode.
• Familiarity with a testing framework. pytest, Jest, or JUnit. Go test, RSpec, or whatever you use.
• Clear written reasoning — your review note has to convince another senior engineer.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
• Prior code-review or technical-interview-grading experience is a plus.

Example tasks

• Reproduce a generated engineering solution to a coding task, run the test suite, and grade it.
• Write the smallest failing test that demonstrates a model's edge-case bug.
• Compare two paired solutions and rank them with a written rationale tied to the rubric.
• Triage a security issue surfaced by a model and document the patch the model should have produced.

Useful experience

• Open-source contributions or a public portfolio that demonstrates production-quality code.
• Experience with the target language's standard tooling, linters, and idiomatic style guides.
• Familiarity with security-review checklists (OWASP, CWE) and AppSec patterns.

Compensation and schedule

$65–$75 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Code review
• Debugging
• Unit testing
• Software engineering judgment
• Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer engineering review