Hazardous Device Expert - Red Team

Mercor

New York (NY)

On-site

USD 90,000 - 130,000

Full time

5 days ago
Be an early applicant
Application generator

Get a reply from this employer — a resume and cover letter tailored to exactly what they’re hiring for.

Get past ATS filters

Job summary

Mercor is assembling a panel of energetic materials and propulsion experts to red-team frontier AI models. You will write prompts across benign, dual-use, and adversarial levels, then evaluate model responses against a policy standard. Finally, you will craft the reference answer and the accompanying technical reasoning.

This role emphasizes writing-intensive work with clear rationales for non-specialists and sustained analysis of misuse scenarios in the field.

Qualifications

  • Public safety professionals with red-teaming exposure.
  • Ability to write clear rationales for non-specialists.
  • Experience reading and writing about misuse scenarios in relevant fields.

Responsibilities

  • Write challenging single-turn prompts across benign, dual-use, and adversarial categories.
  • Evaluate model responses against defined policy standards.
  • Draft reference answers and the technical rationale for correct responses.

Skills

Red-teaming experience
Public safety background
Technical writing
Policy interpretation

Education

Certified bomb technician or hazardous device operator
Military EOD training

Job description

About the work

Mercor is assembling a panel of energetic materials and propulsion experts to red-team frontier AI models. The goal is to test whether a model can correctly judge the misuse potential of a technical request — answering legitimate questions fully while refusing genuinely dangerous ones.

You will:

  • Write challenging single-turn prompts in your domain, labelled across three levels: benign, dual-use, and adversarial.
  • Evaluate the responses that come back against a defined policy standard, and judge whether each was handled correctly.
  • Write the reference answer — what a correct response looks like, and the technical reasoning for why.

This domain lives on the dual-use line more than most. The same assessment that tells a technician how to approach a device tells someone else how it was meant to work; the same compatibility data that keeps a magazine safe describes what stays stable elsewhere. A model that refuses a routine storage or render‑safe question is failing as badly as one that answers a question it shouldn't. Drawing that line reliably is why we need practitioners rather than generalists.

Background we're looking for

We're looking for public safety professionals who have assessed real devices — the render‑safe and post‑incident side, held under certification and command accountability. What matters most is being able to tell a routine professional question from one that's fishing for something else: the same assessment that makes a device safe explains how it was built. You will be writing prompts that sit exactly on that line, then judging whether the model held it.

Examples of relevant backgrounds (ideally with red‑teaming experience):

  • Certified bomb technician or hazardous device operator — device assessment and render‑safe procedures
  • Military EOD with civilian public‑safety, training or instruction experience
  • Bomb squad commander or training officer — team qualification, equipment and protocols
  • Post‑blast investigation and device reconstruction
  • CBRNE technical response — standoff assessment, robotics and disruption tools
What this role demands beyond technical depth

This is writing‑intensive work. Every judgment you make needs a written rationale that a non‑specialist can follow. Prior technical writing, published research, or expert witness experience is a strong signal; please include a sample or link. You will also be reading and writing about misuse scenarios in your field for sustained periods. We brief experts on this in advance, and you can pause or step away at any point without penalty.

Before you apply

Your work here will not involve, and must not draw on, classified or export‑controlled information, or anything covered by an NDA or pre‑publication review obligation. If you hold such obligations you may still be a good fit; tell us in your application and we will scope the work accordingly.

Get your free, confidential resume review.
or drag and drop your file here.
Similar jobs

Similar jobs worth comparing

Hazardous Device Expert - Red Team
Hazardous Device Expert - Red Team

Obsidian • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 120,000
Energetic Materials Expert - Redteaming
Energetic Materials Expert - Redteaming

Mercor • San Francisco (CA)

On-site
USD 140,000 - 240,000
Explosives Specialist - Incident Analyst
Explosives Specialist - Incident Analyst

Obsidian • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 150,000
Explosives Specialist - Incident Analyst
Explosives Specialist - Incident Analyst

Mercor • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 150,000
Hazardous Device Red-Teaming Specialist
Hazardous Device Red-Teaming Specialist

Mercor • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 130,000
Hazardous Devices Red-Team Specialist
Hazardous Devices Red-Team Specialist

Obsidian • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 120,000
Chemical Safety Expert - Redteaming
Chemical Safety Expert - Redteaming

Obsidian • San Francisco (CA)

On-site
USD 150,000 - 210,000
Chemical Safety Expert - Redteaming
Chemical Safety Expert - Redteaming

Mercor • San Francisco (CA)

On-site
USD 120,000 - 160,000
Analytical Chemist - Hazardous Compounds
Analytical Chemist - Hazardous Compounds

Mercor • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 130,000
Radiological Safety Expert - Red Team
Radiological Safety Expert - Red Team

Obsidian • New York (NY)

On-site
USD 90,000 - 130,000